Answer:
The correct answer is (A).
Explanation:
<u>Citizens pay more attention to their elected leaders ---> Citizens are more receptive to politicians messages.</u>
This statement is true because if citizens of a society were more attentive to their elected leaders, statistically more of those citizens would be receptive of the leader's message. This means more people would be paying attention to their leader's messages and therefore receiving the information.
For this reason, the first diagram (A) is TRUE and is the correct answer.
The answer is: c. classical conditioning
In a classical conditioning, a certain behavior is learned by associating a certain stimulus with either positive or negative response.
For examples, let's say that every time the pets heard the sound electric can opener, the pets would immediately receive their food from their owners.
In the long run, the pets would associate the sound of the electric opener with the positive reward (in the form of food). This make the pets become most likely to experience biological response (such as watering mouth) every time they hear the electric opener.
A theodicy for some given fact about evil is an explanation for why God would have an all‐things‐considered sufficient reason to allow that evil. The counterpart theodicy relies on a metaphysical claim about existence. We cannot know what "good" is unless there is "evil" to contrast it with. (1) Doesn't justify all kinds of evil (Do we need genocide to know what goodness is?), (2) Doesn't justify the amount of evil (Do we need so much killing/theft to know what goodness is?), (3) God can know good/evil prior to creation/evil.
Answer:
The correct answer is c) Deadlines for implementation of corrective actions.
Explanation:
Companies or institutions usually make an improvement plan for the benefit of projects; this plan is obtained after a set of steps in which the actions and goals that are to be achieved are identified.
After the completion of the improvement plan, the deadlines for the implementation of corrective actions to systematically comply with the process and seeking the best benefit for the institution are decided.
<em />
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
I believe the answer is: It would be narrow
Judicial restraint is the view that encourages encourages judges to limit the exercise of their own power. This would force the judge to interpret the constitution limited to only things that explicitly written in the constitution, without any chance to make adjustment to changing norms or technology.
