Answer:
Ambiguous facts.
Explanation:
A reader may always interpret; facts, symbols, etc... according to her/his own perspective. However, when you add ambiguousness to the fact, as the noun says, you create and cause confusion, as the fact is considered unclear. So if facts are always open to one's interpretation, an ambiguous fact is definitely super open to interpretation!
The correct answer is D, because that is the only sentence written in the active voice, the rest are written in the passive voice.
For many months, the gigantic struggle then imminent had been painfully discernible to far-seeing men.
Which of these statements is true based on the information provided?
the war could not have been predicted.
the coming war was obvious to some people.
the struggle went on for many months.
watching the conflict was quite painful.
Answer:
From information provided, <u> the coming war was obvious to some people. </u>
Explanation:
Based on the sentence from the text, it is quite clear that the coming war was obvious to some people because according to the text, "the gigantic struggle then imminent had been painfully discernible to far-seeing men." which suggests that from the ongoing struggle, it was imminent that it would escalate to a war to "far-seeing men"
Answer:
To COMPARE data, you think how to things are similar to each other and what their similarities are. To CONTRAST is to see what differences are between the two things, how they differ from each other and what each has that the other hasn’t
ur welcome :)
brainliest please?
