Hey there,
The first government dealt with foreign problems by <span>declaring that we were a neutral country that would not get involved in other countries' issues.
Hope this can help everyone!
~Jurgen</span>
Federal Government > State Government
The rationale for this is that we live in a global world and need collective responses to global challenges. Instead of there being a Utah response and a Virginia response to the need for more STEM graduates, there should be a US response. Economies of scale also come into play. It can cost less and be more efficient to have resources centralized.
State Government > Federal Government
America was founded after a revolution rejected a strong central monarchy and America needs to continue to honor that by allowing citizens in Utah to have different approaches than Virginia. When convenient, the states can choose to collectively band together on issues like defense but that should be the exception and not the rule.
Answer: The two countries share the water in the lakes.
Explanation:
According to Quiz|et, Canada and the U.S. have to work together to clean up the Great Lakes because "the two countries share the water in the lakes."
I hope this helps!
<span> Pizarro seized the Inca emperor,Atahualpa,massacred the senior Inca nobility,extracted a huge ransom in gold and silver for Atahualpa,then murdered him.Pizarro then went on to conquer an effectively leaderless Inca empire.
Much the same with Cortes and the Aztecs - initially pretending to be friendly,Cortes seized the Aztec emperor,extracted a huge ransom for him before murdering him and,although forced to retreat shortly after by superior numbers,soon returned with Mexican native allies to destroy the Aztec empire and conquer it for Spain.
Cortes' conquest was much harder fought than that of Pizarro,but basically their interaction with the natives was the same - kidnap th leader,extort a ransom,kill the hostage anyway,then attack and conquer their people.</span>
That statement is false
Leading question refers to the question that is thrown out to obtain the answer that we want. If a mediator throw a leading question, both parties tend to directly blame each other which prevent the mediator to provide a solution. What the mediator should do is listening to both perspective first and used it as a basis to make a solution.
