Answer:
A strictly dominant action produces: a higher payoff than any other action the player can use for every possible action of the other players.
Explanation:
A strictly dominant action does not play fair. Here, there is no equality because strict dominance requires all payoffs to be strictly greater.
A strictly dominant strategy is that strategy that always provides greater utility to a the player, no matter what the other player's strategy is.
A rational player will avoid a strictly dominated counterpart because if his opponent uses strictly dominated action he will be come out worse off regardless of which moves other players make.
(Paragraph 1) Should eyewitness testimony be allowed in the courtroom? No but at the same time yes. There are many reasons why they should but shouldn't. It is a risk to their safety, some eyewitnesses are not liable, they could be paid off but at the same time their testimony could help win a case. (Paragraph 2) Depending on a crime, the eyewitness safety could be in danger. If the case was against a member of a gang or mafia. They could send someone after that witness. This is reason why we have the Witness Protection Program. If they testify they put their lives at risk. (Paragraph 3) Having a witness is a key thing to have. If you have a witness you are the one who most likely the one to win the case. In some cases you could have problems with the witness not being liable, getting paid off to not say anything or to lie. Or in most cases if they are confused they will not have them testify. Or they aren't straight on the details and keep changing the story that usually means they are lying on what they saw.
Note: This is a summary. Add more and edit it to make it sound like something you would type.
Answer:
2 Days
Explanation:
First, there is the need to rewrite the utility function for clarity
U=V^{1/2}
1. The Probability of Falling ill by someone in the family is given as 20%
2. If someone should fall ill, the total number of days that would be spoiled is calculated as:
Total number of vacation= 10 days x Probability to fall ill = 20%
= 10 x 0.2 = 2 days
This means if someone should fall ill based on the probability, then 2 out of the total 10 days can be ruined
3. The number of days for vacation days to enjoy is 10-2 = 8 days
This means if the family gives up 2 days of probable illness, they can still enjoy their vacation.
V= 2 days
He is not sincere.
This is the negative form of the sentence.
Gabriel had no idea how consumers would respond to a survey about attitudes toward a program opening up space travel to private citizens. He could use a survey with open-ended questions.
Space travel to private citizens:
On June 7, 2019, NASA said that beginning in 2020, it intends to start permitting commercial astronauts to go to the International Space Station using the SpaceX Crew Dragon and the Boeing Starliner spacecraft for public astronauts, with a planned daily cost of $35,000 USD.
Three paying clients and a retired NASA astronaut set off for the International Space Station. The trip is the first to visit the space station with only private persons aboard, and it is also the first time NASA has worked with other organizations to coordinate a space tourism visit.
Learn more about space travel to private citizens here:
brainly.com/question/14990057
#SPJ4
