Answer:
A. Generating, refining, and evaluating potential marketing actions.
Explanation:
Marketing research are the processes that are used to connect consumers and manufacturers to marketers. Infornation is used to generate, refine, and evaluate potential marketing actions. It is used to evaluate marketing mix and how changes affects the consumer's behaviour.
General Mills used marketing research to identify ways to grow the brand, promote it, and evaluated plans to market it. Due to increased demand for organic and natural foods.
This is use of generating, refining, and evaluating potential marketing actions.
Answer:
Explanation:
The preparation of the income statement is presented below using the generally accepted accounting Principles (GAAP) :
Sales $176,000
Less: Cost of goods sold ($97,200) ($54,000 + $43,200)
Gross margin $78,800
Less: Selling and administrative cost ($31,000) ($17,200 + $13,800)
Net income $47,800
Hence, we considered all the given information
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": to raise competition among firms in the cartel.
Explanation:
A cartel is a group of companies or countries working together to regulate the price of a single product they produce in common. The cartel makes it impossible for a foreign business to enter the market and demand lower prices. Cartels are, in most cases, not helpful to customers. They generate high prices that remain unchanged until consumers find alternative ways to purchase the same items.
Under such a scenario,<em> cartels are unlikely to be formed to generate more competition among the companies that compose them.</em>
Answer:
1. Per se application - US Competition law
Justification: It is a provision of US competition law
2. Misuse of activity - EU Competition law
Justification: It is a provision of EU competition law
3. Extraterritoriality - US and EU
Justification: It is a provision of US and EU antitrust and competition law
4. Trade obstacle, non-tariff - France
Justification: These are considered to be part of the France trade system
5. Strict liability - U.S. Tort Law
Justification: It is part of the U.S. Tort Law and depends on intent to harm liability
6. Punitive damages - U.S. Product Liability Law
Justification: It is a provision of U.S. Product Liability Law
Answer:
Imagine you have just flicked a lighter. If you don’t see the flame, you will naturally try a second time. If after the second attempt it does not strike a flame, you will repeat your action again and again until it does. Eventually, you’ll see the flame and you’ll know that your lighter works. But what if it doesn’t? How long are you going to flick the lighter until you decide to give up?
Our everyday life is full of such decision dilemmas and uncertainty. We constantly have to choose between options, whether we make the most ordinary decisions – should I continue flicking this lighter? – or life-changing choices – should I leave this relationship? We can either keep on doing what we are already used to do, or risk unexplored options that could turn out much more valuable.
Some people are naturally inclined to take more chances, while others prefer to hold on to what they know best. Yet being curious and explorative is fundamental for humans and animals to find out how best to harvest resources such as water, food or money. While looking at the Belém Tower – a symbol of Portugal’s great maritime discoveries – from my office window, I often wonder what drives people to explore the unknown and what goes on in their brains when weighing pros and cons for trying something new. To answer these questions, together with Dr. Zachary Mainen and his team of neuroscientists, we investigate how the brain deals with uncertainty when making decisions.
Explanation:
It is well known that the decision-making process results from communication between the prefrontal cortex (working memory) and hippocampus (long-term memory). However, there are other regions of the brain that play essential roles in making decisions, but their exact mechanisms of action still are unknown.