Price support will be beneficial to producers but costly to consumers.
Price support refers to efforts by a government to keep the price of a commodity higher than it should be were it priced based on supply and demand.
Ways the government can do this include:
- Subsidies
- Production quotas - limiting the quantity produced
- Price controls
Price supports make prices higher than they should be which would give producers more profit therefore tennis racket producers benefit.
On the other hand, they make things more expensive for consumers who will be forced to spend more than they usually do on tennis rackets thereby making it costly to them.
In conclusion, price controls help producers but are costly to consumers.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/2124058.</em>
Answer:
dysfunction; promotes sexism
Explanation:
The answer is
dysfunction; promotes sexism
Karl Marx is known as the father of social conflict theory. According to the conflict theory, there are very limited resources and inequality in the society and people are in a state of a never ending conflict they focuses mainly on this resources in the society.
Conflict theorists claims that the society is maintain by the power and domination instead of conformity and consensus.
Social conflict theory claims that the passages given in the context is a abnormality or a dysfunction of the system called the society because it promotes the dominion of the men to the women that leads to promotes sexism when wives are asks to submit themselves to their husbands in the name of the religion.
Thus the answer is --
dysfunction; promotes sexism
You are only a boy or a girl no in between so you can put
4.7%
hope this helps! Good luck!
The researchers were most concerned about External events.
<h3><u>Explanation: </u></h3>
Quasi-experimental designs are different from true experimental designs. They resemble the experimental research but it is not the real one. There are various types of quasi-experiment design, one of the important designs is the pretest and posttest design which is discussed in the above scenario.
The most likely reason for the experimental effect is based on selection bias. Self-fulfilling Prophecy & Instrument Decay might be the potential cause of the internal validity that is linked with the experiment done by the staff.
