Answer:
Through the diverse cases represented in this collection, we model the different functions that the civic imagination performs. For the moment, we define civic imagination as the capacity to imagine alternatives to current cultural, social, political, or economic conditions; one cannot change the world without imagining what a better world might look like.
Beyond that, the civic imagination requires and is realized through the ability to imagine the process of change, to see one’s self as a civic agent capable of making change, to feel solidarity with others whose perspectives and experiences are different than one’s own, to join a larger collective with shared interests, and to bring imaginative dimensions to real world spaces and places.
Research on the civic imagination explores the political consequences of cultural representations and the cultural roots of political participation. This definition consolidates ideas from various accounts of the public imagination, the political imagination, the radical imagination, the pragmatic imagination, creative insurgency or public fantasy.
In some cases, the civic imagination is grounded in beliefs about how the system actually works, but we have a more expansive understanding stressing the capacity to imagine alternatives, even if those alternatives tap the fantastic. Too often, focusing on contemporary problems makes it impossible to see beyond immediate constraints.
This tunnel vision perpetuates the status quo, and innovative voices —especially those from the margins — are shot down before they can be heard.
Answer:
assimilation
Explanation:
This behavior that Louis is exhibiting reflects Piaget's concept of assimilation. According to Jean Piaget, this is a cognitive process in which the individual managers new information and incorporates that information into their existing knowledge base. Which is what Louis is doing since he is using his knowledge of dribbling a basketball and uses that information with the new soccer ball.
Answer:
true
Explanation:
The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) is a Federal law that published in 1938 which establishes the wage and hour standards that must be followed for most public and private employees in the United States of America. This Act includes topics regarding minimum wage, overtime pay, and leave. One of the topics states that employees may take up to twelve weeks of leave within a twelve-month period to care for the employee's spouse, child, or parent who has a serious health condition. Therefore this statement can be marked as true.
Is that church leaders or ministers did not take ideas from their own. So some we forced out of Massachusetts. Hope this helps :)
Answer: I’ll tell you the negative and positive effects
Explanation:
So, as American became more industrial the population grew, more people came to cities, meaning more profit (money) which was good for buisness. And the government can set out a larger tax pay to benefit themselves, however that will make the the people mad and more likely to protest and boycot businesses .