Answer:
Criterion Validity
Explanation:
Criterion Validity: In psychometrics, the term "criterion validity" is also referred to as "concrete validity", and is described as a phenomenon in which the degree of a specific measure is associated with an outcome of some other measure is being determined.
However, criterion validity is further divided into predictive and concurrent validity. Criterion validity is being used by the researcher if the researcher wants to predict a specific behavior in some situations, for example, present, future, or past.
In the question above, Dominic is questioning the criterion validity of the test.
Answer
He was in the marines, and he was suffering from a brain tumor pressing against his amygdala
Explanation:
the amygdala is what decides the emotional impact of things, he wasn't capable of thinking what he was doing was wrong basically. He was a perfectly normal human being before he got this tumor. Hope this helped!!
Answer:
points
Explanation:
hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Answer:
3- destroying valued possessions or attacking pets
Explanation:
Emotional abuse is any kind of abuse in which the abuser tries to gain control over another person's feelings or emotions. This kind of abuse is not physical but emotional and can involve shaming, ignoring, belittling, criticizing, intimidating and so on. The abuser sometimes threatens to hurt the victim or themselves, isolate the victims from other friends, ridicule or intimidate the victim or sometimes go as far as destroying things owned by the victim.
Over time, constant emotional abuse can result to feeling of worthlessness, low self esteem and destruction of self confidence.
Therefore, from the options above destroying valued possessions or attacking pets best describes an example of emotional abuse.
CORRECT ANSWER:
there is no
so is the consequent
a whole may
does not constitute
there is no
STEP-BY-STEP EXPLANATION:
To have an argument, you must have a factual claim and an inferential claim. This means that at least one statement in an argument must claim to present evidence, and there must be a claim that this evidence implies something. In a conditional statement, <em><u>there is no</u></em> assertion that either the antecedent or the consequent is true. Rather there is only the assertion that if the antecedent is true, then <u><em>is the consequent .</em></u>Of course, a conditional statement as <u><em>a whole way present</em></u> evidence because it asserts a relationship between statements. Yet when conditional statements are taken in this sense, a single conditional statement <u><em>does not constitute</em></u> an argument because <u><em>there is no</em></u> separate claim that this evidence implies anything.