It was meant to warn Americans against potential peril in the wake of the 1890 census which coldly stated that there was no longer unexplored wilderness in America (sans Alaska), that there was no longer a contiguous frontier, there was also not an official statement saying that the frontier had been closed because it was merely hearsay.
They extend from our shore into the continental shelf. Not to mention, we have an EEZ, or exclusive economic zone, which extends about 200 nautical miles from our shores. In this area, we have full economic jurisdiction.
This answer would depend on what the country you are referring too. For the world, I foresee that there will most likely be more war as right now Putin is pushing his ambitions to restore the once known empire of the Soviet Union. This means war in major continents Asia and Europe. NATO is in both continents, and if one country gets involved, they all do. This would mean more than 50% of the worlds countries would be at war with Russia under the agreement of NATO.
Answer:
In my opinion, they didn't.
Explanation:
The "Indian Removal" refers to a time period when a lot of native American people were forced to get out from their ancestral homes. The reason for this was because the US government wanted to obtain control over the natural resources that exist within these lands. In return, they gave the Native American people with a set of land that they called "Reservation".
But, the value of the reservation land was nothing compared to the value of the land that was taken away from them. (Both from cultural and economic point of view). This action prevented the Native American community to develop their community and massively reduced their social influence in United States.
