All categories

3 years ago

What are unlawful questions to ask during an interview

Business

2 answers:

AveGali [126]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Race, Color, or National Origin.

Religion.

Sex, Gender Identity, or Sexual Orientation.

Pregnancy status.

Disability.

Age or Genetic Information.

Citizenship.

Marital Status or Number of Children.

Explanation:

sergey [27]3 years ago

4 0

Questions about Religion, Race or color, Pregnancy status, Sexual orientation, Citizenship, Disability, etc are unlawful and should not be asked during an interview.

<u>Explanation: </u>

An employer may not discriminate against a candidate in the United States because of his ethnicity, color, faith, sex (including gender, sexuality, and pregnancy), age, and disability. Federal and state legislation is in place to prevent discrimination in employment.

In United States, Every student who thinks that he or she has behaved inappropriately during the interview will contact OCS (Office of career strategy).

For Example, Marital / Family status:

Illegal: Are you married? You've got kids? If so, what is the childcare you are doing? You expect to have kids shortly? You were ever divorced? Where is your wife working?

Legal: Are you ready and capable to put the overtime needed and/or to travel? Would you like to move?

You might be interested in

Grossman lumber reported $102,000 net cash provided by its operating activities. if the company invests $4,000 in capital expend

sweet [91]

FCF is a measure of how much cash a business generates from operations, net of capital expenditures, which it can use for various purposes, such as reducing debt or paying out dividends. When calculating FCF, we take Cash provided by operating activities and subtract any capital expenditures. Grossman Lumber generated $102,000 in cash from operations, and invested 4,000 in capital expenditures, so its FCF is 102,000-4,000= $98,000. We are not concerned with dividends because dividends are not a capital expenditure.

6 0

3 years ago

According to behavioral economics, consumers A. always behave rationally because they take into account monetary costs and nonm

FromTheMoon [43]

Answer:

E. do not always behave rationally because they are overly optimistic about their future behavior.

Explanation:

Behavioral economics is the study of irrational economic decisions from people's behavior.

Behavioral economics includes the people's emotional framework to make choices beyond the rational choice theory, which states that a rational person is not moved by emotions and social factors to choose the option that maximizes their satisfaction.

To be overly optimistic about your future behavior is biased from social factors and it is a behavior that could be understood from the human emotional framework.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

While eating at Alex’s "Pizza by the Slice" restaurant, Clara experiences diminishing marginal utility. She received 10 utils fr

klemol [59]

Answer:

Alex may have to lower the price to convince Clara to buy a second slice.

Explanation:

Marginal utility is an economic concept that says that a consumer recieves more marginal utility in the first consumption of a good or services than in the second and the subsequents. In fact with each consumption the marginal utility reduces, this effect is known as diminishing marginal utility.

One of the the methods to reduce the effects of the diminishing marginal utility is to reduces prices. As the utility of a product decreases as its consumption increases, consumers are willing to pay smaller amount of money for more of the product.

6 0

3 years ago

Henry is a landlord renting an apartment to Steven, a student at a nearby university. The two enter into a one-year lease arra

Sindrei [870]

Answer:

Mitigate his damages

Explanation:

By law, mitigation involves making effort to reduce losses. Now, an individual claiming damages or losses due to break in contract or a wrongful act by another individual has a duty under the law to mitigate those damages. That is to say, the plantiff is under a duty under the law to reduce the loss by taking advantage of any opportunity arising that may help.redice the losses or damages. However, in this case, the plantiff, who's the landlord Henry did not mitigate the loss by not attempting to or renting the accommodation out for the remaining six month. Thus, the damages would likely be reduced because he failed to mitigate his damages as he should have done as required under the law.

3 0

3 years ago

You are part of a group, making a decision about whether it is appropriate to discontinue research on a new drug. This new drug

Rufina [12.5K]

Answer: An escalation of commitment

Explanation:

Carrying out projects can be capital, time and energy intensive. Most times they could result to a positive progress or result and other times they may not but the area of changing minds on a project that has had a great ton of investment is usually hard except there is nothing that would be gotten from it. When so much time and resources has been put into a project and there is no plan for a change such commitment is called an escalation of commitment

6 0

3 years ago