<h3 /><h3>
</h3>
Equation for Perimeter of a rectangle: Perimeter = 2W + 2L
<h3>Defining the variables, let</h3>
<h3>Width = x</h3><h3>Length = 2x+3 (3 more than twice the width)</h3>
<h3>Plugging everything into the equation</h3>
<h3>30= 2(x) + 2(2x+3) using the distributive property,</h3>
<h3>30=2x+4x+6 combining like terms</h3>
<h3>30=6x+6 subtracting 6 from both sides,</h3>
<h3>24=6x divide both sides by 6</h3>
<h3>4=x This means that the width is 4 m.</h3>
<h3>To get the length, use the expression L=2x+3 and plug in x = 4 that was already solved for</h3>
<h3>L=2(4)+3</h3>
<h3>L=8+3 = 11 m</h3>
<h3>So the dimensions of the rectangle are width is 4 m and length is 11 m.</h3>
Answer:
Please what are you trying to say
The answer is 72.1.you should dot infront sizes and then equals them
Answer:
PR = 5 because LP + PR = LR according to the Segment Addition Postulate, and 7 + 5 = 12 using substitution
Step-by-step explanation:
The naming of the segments suggests that point P is between L and R, so that ...
LP + PR = LR
This corresponds to the last choice.
_____
<em>Comments on the alternate interpretation</em>
On the other hand, if point L is between P and R, then the segments are PL and LR. The Segment Addition Postulate would tell you that ...
PL + LR = PR
The Reflexive Property of Congruence would tell you that PL = LP. The Substitution Property would tell you LP can be substituted into this equation, making it ...
LP + LR = PR
and by the commutative property, ...
LR + LP = PR.
Multiple properties of addition and congruence are involved with this interpretation, which more or less matches the third choice. That is, the simple explanation of answer choice 3, by itself, is insufficient to explain why the length of PR should be considered to be 19, not 5.
9514 1404 393
Answer:
see below (upper right)
Step-by-step explanation:
A function has no repeated x-values in the relation. The only table with unique x-values is the one shown below. It is upper right in your picture.
