The fact that people who watch a lot of violent TV are also more likely to be aggressive does not in itself proof a cause-effect relationship. That is, there is no evidence that one situation is a cause and the other one is a consequence (causation). It only proves that both characteristics are present together (correlation).
This could be a case of “spurious correlation,” which implies that two characteristics are often present together because there is a third factor that influences both of them.
For example, if we assume that this case refers to minors, it could be that minors who watch a lot of violent TV are neglected by their parents. Additionally, it could be that children who behave aggressively are also neglected by their parents. If that were the case, then being neglected would be a more likely predictor of violent behaviour, as opposed to watching violent TV.
In order to make sure there is a cause-effect relationship, we would need to perform an experiment where all other factors are controlled.
Answer:
opposing to another ones beliefs or idea creates an hostile environment in a society of people
Explanation:
<span>. Africa was controlled by European nations the french controlled much of west and central Africa the British controlled much of the south Africa and large portions of east Africa the Belgians controlled the Congo </span>
Answer:
A) acquisition
Explanation:
Kieran can say that <em>acquisition</em> has occurred as soon as the parrot greets him in response to his entry. According to classical conditioning, repeated pairings between the conditioned stimulus with the unconditioned stimulus leads to acquisition. The conditioned stimulus is a stimulus that produced no response before, that is Kieran's entry.
