The correct answer is: It can refute the counterclaim with facts.
The purpose of evidence is to prove or disprove the veracity of something and, therefore, appealing to the reader's emotions (pathos), as the first and third options state, is unnecessary. Counterclaims are used to refute the claim, so evidence is used to contrarest the counterclaim.
The introduction, body, body 2 and than your conclusion. I’m pretty sure
What is similar about the presentation of the scene of the execution in the image and the text is that both demonstrate that Dionysius is in command of the situation.
In <em>Damon and Pythias,</em> <u>Pythias is condemned to death by Dionysius</u>, a Greek politician who ruled Syracuse. In the myth, <u>Pythias asks permission from the ruler</u> to return home and set his affairs in order, which implies that Dionysius has the power to decide everything. Moreover, <u>it is the politician who also determines to free both Damon and Pythias</u>. Therefore, throughout the story, <u>it is Dionysius who controls the fate of the two friends.</u> This can also be seen in the image, where <u>Dionysius is sitting on the throne wearing his crown. </u>Furthermore, the ruler is pointing someone, which indicates he is giving an order. He also has his army standing in front of him and a soldier behind him for protection.
No you uiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
