Answer: I. Introduce the bill for consideration
II. Gather support for the bill and get as much information as possible towards the debate of the bill
Explanation: As a House of Representatives member, once I introduce the bill for consideration, I become the sponsor of the bill. I'll try as much as possible to get the support of my colleagues early on and some may decide to co-sponsor the bill.
When the time to debate the bill comes, I would make sure to have gathered enough relevant information and data as well as support to ensure that when it is time to vote, the bill would scale through.
INTOLREANCE – Everything from religion and art of personal choices
The principle that the federal courts can "check" on the other branches is called "judicial review" - I think that this is what should be filled into the gap!
It means that the court can check the others' work. For example, it can declare some passed laws or executive orders unconstitutional.
<span>This was the case of "Holt v. Hobbs". In this case, Holt, a practicing Salafi Muslim, claimed that the imposition of facial hair restrictions were an imposition based upon the Religious Land Use and Imprisoned Persons Act. The 9-0 majority found that the prison had not exhausted all available measures for accommodating Mr. Holt and that the grooming policy was an imposition against his religious needs.</span>
Answer:
George Berkeley
Explanation:
George Berkeley was an Anglo-Irish philosopher who was well known for his theory which he propounded and called immaterialism. He was born on 12 March 1685 and died on 14 January 1753 in the UK.
He was an Irish empiricist who denied the existence of material objects and asserted that only minds and ideas exist.
