Based on the given description above, I can say that this refers to PARTISANSHIP. When we say partisanship, this is when a party possesses that prejudice in order to show being in favor to a particular group or cause. In this case, every republic supports a bill even if it is not favored by all because it is proposed by a fellow republican. The answer for this would be option A.
Answer:
C) Revise the articles of Confederation
Explanation:
Abigail Adams (1744–1818) projected that the Massachusetts revolt of 1786 led by Daniel Shays (ca. 1741–1825) "will prove to be sallutary to the state at large," even though it was driven by "ignorant, wrestless desperates, without conscience or representatives." Many in the United States claimed that a powerful central government was required to deter these territorial uprisings against established rule. In this scene, Shays and Job Shattuck (1736–1819), both Revolutionary Army veterans and leaders of the 1786 rebellion, are featured. Afterward, Madison and Washington consider Confederation.
Answer:
States prefer block grants because it's like a chunk of money (not a super specific purpose, can use for more things, ie: 10,000 to Parks and Rec dept)
The government probably prefers to give categorical grants because they're more specific (towards one thing, ie: 10,000 to spend on park benches only)
We basically thought everything was fine and good and in turn avoided the war in Europe but still providing aide to our ally, until the Japanese decided to bomb Pearl Harbor in order to make us back off from the war but it back fired majorly, we then created the atomic bomb or nuke and bombed Hiroshima & Nagasaki Japan.
