Answer:
The strategic role of premium pricing is to create the perception that the products is superior to other competing products.
Explanation:
A premium pricing sets the price of a product higher than competing products. This strategy will automatically make the product stand out.
The economic circumstances that would encourage this pricing strategy include high demand for this particular product as well as a larger addressable market for it.
Generally speaking, increasing the price will also create better customer service, PR and clout. That will create an emotional connection with potential customers.
Creating and maintaining a premium brand with a steady and increasing premium patronage is the goal as suggested by Mark Williams for Roast Coffee.
Answer:
1.53 Million
Explanation:
The reason is that the Environment Protection Agency is a qualified organization and donations made to qualified organization are allowable expense under the US tax rules, so the gross income will include a net amount which is the actual amount left for Hal Gore and which is $1.53 million ($2.1 m - 0.57).
If a policy change causes a Pareto improvement, is the outcome necessarily Pareto efficient if a policy change causes a Pareto improvement, then the outcome is not necessarily Pareto efficient this is because another change in the policy could cause another Pareto improvement.
A Pareto development is a development of a device whilst an alternative in the allocation of goods harms no person and advantages as a minimum one character. Pareto enhancements also are called "no-brainers" and are generally predicted to be rare, due to the plain and effective incentive to make any available Pareto development.
Factors that lie within the PPF display an inefficient or below-usage of resources – this is Pareto inefficient. A Pareto development way that output of both products can increase as we move from inside the PPF to factors at the PPF boundary.
Learn more about Pareto here:
brainly.com/question/7304310
#SPJ4
Answer:
<em>This is a violation of the stored Communications Act.</em>
Explanation:
The Stored Communications Act (SCA), protects the rights of people and organizations from its participants to leak any information. This act works on the principle of the rights to be secure and protected.
As Sonya and other employees were using social media to chat about the company, the info was not being held private and came under the violation of the stored communication act. As a result, Sonya and other participants were fired.
Answer:
The court ruled against both Americar and Regency Inn, and then Regency Inn won its case against Americar. The nuisance case itself is pretty unpleasant, so it's not worth referring to it.
The fundamentals for the ruling against Americar were that they themselves had drafted the lease agreement and that the clause included in the lease agreement by which they agreed to indemnify Regency Inn was valid. The original lease term had already expired, but Americar continued to lease the offices on a monthly basis. Since they never left the place, the clauses in the original agreement were still valid even though the lease changed to a monthly basis. I.e. if you sign a lease contract and after the original contract is over, you continue to lease the same place, then the clauses from the original contract still apply.
The clause stated that Americar was liable for damages that took place on the leased premises or in their proximity, i.e. the area near their offices. The parking lot was considered to be in the proximity of Americar's offices.
