Answer:
$415,000
Explanation:
Following is the formula for cash flow:
<em>Ending Cash Balance = CFO + CFI + CFF + Beginning Cash Balance</em>
<em>CFO = Cash flow from operating activities</em>
<em>CFI = Cash flow from investing activities</em>
<em>CFF = Cash flow from financing activities</em>
We can easily rearrange the formula to find CFO
<em>Ending Cash Balance - CFI - CFF - Beginning Cash Balance = CFO </em>
<em>or </em>
<em>CFO = Ending Cash Balance - CFI - CFF - Beginning Cash Balance</em>
<u>Solution</u>
<em>CFO = $415,000</em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Given
Consumption = (10 x 30) = 300
Investment = (100 x 2) = 200
Government Spending = (500 x 1) =500
13. Total GDP for this economy = Consumption + Investment+ Government spending
=(10 x 30) + (100 x 2) + (500 x 1)
=$1000
14. Consumption % on GDP
= Consumption/ Total GDP x 100
=(300/1000) x 100
= 30%
15. Investment % in GDP
= Investment / Total GDP x 100
=(200/ 1000) x 100
=20%
16. Government spending % on GDP
=Government spending/ Total GDP x 100
=(500/1000) x 100
=50%
Answer:
equivalent annual cost: 19,784.81
The investment is not economically justified as it is cheaper to pay the fines than invest in the equipment to avoid them.
Explanation:
We calcualte the PMT of a 75,000 dollars equipment at 10%
PV 75,000
time 5
rate 0.1
C $ 19,784.811
EPA fines: <u> </u><u>$ 18,500.00 </u>
differential: (1, 284.81)
Answer:
Trade credit
Explanation:
Trade credit occurs between traders where a trader allows another to purchase goods without paying for them immediately.
It is the cheapest form of short term financing.
This is a form of business to business agreement where payment is set at a later date of 30 days, 90 days or 60 days.
The transaction is recorded by using invoice.
Usually it is a zero percent short term finance. The amount of the good at time of purchase is what is paid at the sure date.
There is no extra payment made by the buyer as interest on the amount agreed.
Answer:
$355 unfavorable
Explanation:
Budgeted supplies cost was [$1,860 + (635 frames x $ 11)] = ($1,860 + $6,985) = $8,845
Actual supplies cost was $9,200, so the variance was = budgeted cost - actual cost = $8,845 - $9,200 = $355 unfavorable
Since the actual supplies cost was higher than the budgeted supplies cost, then the variance must be unfavorable (because more money was spent than expected).
