<span>Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) vastly expanded the powers of Congress through a single clause in the Constitution: the Commerce Clause of Article I, Section 8. The Court ruled that under that clause Congress had powers to regulate any aspect of commerce that crossed state lines, including modes of transportation, and that such regulation preempted conflicting regulation by the states. Since Gibbons, the Commerce Clause has provided the basis for sweeping congressional power over a multitude of national issues.</span>
Kendra believes that her mother and teacher deserve respect because 1) they are adults 2)she could get in trouble for being rude to them. But her younger brother can't discipline her. She will also be kind to her brother around her parents because she knows how to manipulate and pretend to be nice so that she won't get in trouble. <span />
Interpersonal - between people
Intrapersonal - self
Discussion:
Persuasion has the objective of making the audience of one person or more believe and support the presenter's ideas. For example, If I believe that a metal chair supports more weight than a wood one, I would try to persuade with the goal of making people support that claim. The easiest way is with facts. However, even if hard grounded facts, there are some variables that affect my speech effectiveness, in this case, profanity and political correctness.
When considering using those two forms of communication, I have to have in mind other factors: who is my audience? Age? Culture? Reception for profanity or political correctness? What is my setting? Where Am I doing the speech? For example, If I’m in a bar with friends, humor using profanity could be more assertive than the opposite. If I’m in an office, the political correctness could be much more adequate, etc. When choosing between these two forms of communication, I have to choose the most adequate word choice, formality level, slangs, cultural references, academic level in data, etc.
Territorial expansion remained popular with the U.S. public, as did the idea of spreading republican government. Many pro-slavery Southerners sought to expand southwards, allowing for more territory where slavery could continue to grow and expand.
Human Sacrifices is the act of killing one or more humans, usually as an offering to a deity, as part of a ritual. Human sacrifice has been practiced in various cultures throughout history.
I mean.
They're both in history and ''practiced''.
Though a connection, no, Territorial expansion went along with slavery. The act of killing another human being is not very humane nor a connection. Slavery deals with principles of property law are applied to them, allowing individuals to own, buy and sell other individuals, as a de jure form of property. A slave is unable to withdraw unilaterally from such an arrangement and works without remuneration. Human Sacrifices deal with people who have really no choice and are dead either way, victims were typically ritually killed in a manner that was supposed to please or appease gods, spirits or the deceased. Slavery doesn't deal with death. So, no.
