D. Builders were held legally accountable for their work.
Today we might speak of something like "criminal negligence" to describe a home builder whose work was done improperly in such a way that the house collapsed, or went up in flames because of improperly done wiring, etc. We might not pursue the death penalty for such an offense, but we would hold the builder legally responsible also and there would be legal consequences.
Answer:
<u><em>They protected the home country’s economy at the colonists’ expense</em></u>.
Explanation:
Interestingly this colonist where affected after the Wool Act because it resulted in higher value of British clothes as a result of export ban of foreign wool.
The Iron Act which was meant to increase local iron production was opposed because they were resulting in losses for the growing iron and steel companies.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Barton dealt with the argument that nursing wounded soldiers was inappropriate and “unseemly for a woman” in that she first, felt strong enough to go help the soldiers, and second, she considered was a patriotic action to serve her country.
She expressed it in the following way: <em>"The patriot blood of my father was warm in my veins." </em>She considered that her roles were rough and inappropriate for men and also for women, but that she was blessed with health to do her job.
Yes, she presents a convincing point of view that women were capable of performing wartime roles because that was their input, their way to participate and fulfill their role during the war. As she mentions in part of the excerpt, her father fought in the war, and at least, she could work in the war.