There were a lot of factors. To start, the United States started pushing for Democracy, while the soviet union was obviously communist
These two systems are polar opposites, and because of those differences, there was obviously conflict between the two even during WWII (although yes, they were technically allies)
Oh yeh, and both sides had nukes now after WWII. Which meant we started pointing them at each other. And seeing who would pull the trigger first (Mutually assured destruction: you shoot a nuke at me, I'll shoot all mine at you) believe it or not, MAD was pretty effective at keeping the peace during the cold war.
But in 1950-1953, just a few years after WWII ended, South Korea (backed by the US) and North Korea (backed by communist China, soviet union) went to war (North invaded the South). We sent "ambassaders" to the South so they wouldn't be taken over by communists, but everyone knew they were really just soldiers. This is the beginning of "containment"
We wanted to "contain" communism. It started with the Korea War, and was cited as reason to become involved in Vietnam 10 years later.
TO SUMMARIZE: We went from an alliance to the Cold War because of our differing views on how the government and the economy should operate (Capitalism, vs Communism)
Nations started opposing each other because they were forced to ally with the United States, who was trying to spread Democracy, or with the Soviets, who were spreading communism.
Nations mainly disagreed on how their economies and governments should be run, which ultimately determined who they sided with during the cold war.
Answer:
- most likely slaves
Explanation:
Slave revolts were most likely when slaves outnumbered whites, when masters were absent, during periods of economic distress, and when there was a split within the ruling elite. They were also most common when large numbers of native-born Africans had been brought into an area at one time.
Answer:
José Bernardo Gutiérrez , Augustus Magee (c)
Explanation:
The others don’t make sense. It’s not Father Hidalgo and not Philip Nolan. It’s definitely not Anglo settlers so it is c.
Free trade provides several advantages over mercantilism for individuals, businesses and nations. In a free trade system, individuals benefit from a greater choice of goods for purchase at affordable prices. Mercantilism restricts imports, which reduces the choices available to consumers in the marketplace.
Hope this Helps! Please mark me brainliest!
<span>the battle of el alemein and victory of north africa was decisive. Gaining control was a huge morale boost for the allies, giving them something to cheer about. It meant the oil supplies were under the control of the allies and not the axis, whenn the axis was running out of these supplies. The Axis required NA to meet up with the other army group in Italy, it could now not do this, weakening position and altaring the outcome of the war</span>