Answer:
<em>6 1/2 inches</em>
Step-by-step explanation:
If it is 1/2 an inch per hour, and it burns for 5 hours, you will multiple to find the amount of inches burned.
5 hours x 1/2 in./hour = 2.5 inches burned in five hours
Then subtract the total burned from 9.
9 - 2.5 = 6.5
Answer:
Sorry that is toooooooooooooooooooooo much
Step-by-step explanation:
P of selecting point on the shaded region = shaded area/whole area
<span>P( selecting point on the shaded ) = ( the four shaded circles ) / the whole square </span>
<span>P of selecting point on the shaded = ( 4 * ( π * r^2 ) )/ x^2 </span>
<span>P of selecting point on the shaded = ( 4 * ( π * (x/4)^2 ) )/ x^2 </span>
<span>P of selecting point on the shaded = ( 4 * ( π * x^2/16 ) )/ x^2 </span>
<span>P of selecting point on the shaded = ( π * x^2/4 )/ x^2 </span>
<span>P of selecting point on the shaded = x^2( π/4 )/ x^2 </span>
<span>P( selecting point on the shaded ) = π/4 ≈ 0.7854 ≈ 79%
=80%
D is right option hope this helps</span>
Yes, there is statistical evidence that the drug is effective in reducing infarct size because p-value is less than the significance value.
<h3>
How to find hypothetical Evidence?</h3>
Let us first define the hypotheses;
Null Hypothesis; H₀: µ = 25
Alternative Hypothesis; H₁: µ < 25
Standard Deviation; σ = 10
Sample mean; x' = 16
Sample size; n = 8
z-score is;
z = (16 - 25)/(10/√8)
z = -2.55
From online z-score table, the p-value is 0.005
Since p-value is less than the significance value, then we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the drug is effective in reducing infarct size.
Read more about Hypothetical Evidence at; brainly.com/question/875167
#SPJ1
The graph of a system of parallel lines will always have no solutions. The correct answer is A, always.