I believe the answer is interactioni<span>sm
</span>interactioni<span>sm is a perspective that viewed the behavior of individuals in a certain social group would affect the behavior of another individual.
Because of this, this perspective tend to study the actions and relationship displayed by members of the group, such as how intimate group members interract with one another.</span>
Answer:
The statement that proves to be true is that the researcher will not interact with the participants.
Explanation:
The reason to support the statement is because the researcher should not be conducting any behavior as he/ she wishes to find genuine types of interaction that may lead to the main goal which is to show cooperation between peers. If there was anything planned or spoken between peers and researcher, then the latter would not be ethic when going through the observation method to gather the information that is intended to be used.
Answer: High magnitude of consequences
Explanation:
The scam had a high magnitude of consequences as its effect had an impact on both the firm and individuals that worked in the firm.
