1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tiny-mole [99]
4 years ago
13

Can one nation or empire take over another nation without oppressing others?

History
1 answer:
Svet_ta [14]4 years ago
5 0
A nation or empire can do it without bloodshed if both countries agree to it. It is called Annexation.
You might be interested in
What is the meaning of life
boyakko [2]
To live it to the fullest! :)
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why were African American voters more likely to vote Republican in the late 1800s?
lyudmila [28]

because the republicans were more in favor of african american votes than democratics were?

7 0
3 years ago
Which development would most likely reduce the standard of living in the
Liono4ka [1.6K]

Answer:

A. It becomes more difficult for U.S. citizens to get health care.

Explanation:

If people cannot have access to healthcare, there will be more illnesses/injuries and it will decrease the standard of living. If people start traveling to different states, that won't affect the standard of living in any way. If factories begin producing goods at a faster rate, it will be convenient for people. I don't know what the gold standard is but I'm assuming it's a good thing, so that isn't the answer. The only negative thing is answer choice, so that is the answer.

8 0
3 years ago
10. Factors encouraging the influx of new immigrants during the Gilded
cluponka [151]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Because America was still at war with other countries.

5 0
3 years ago
Social Darwinists believed that
pychu [463]

Answer: B) powerful nations were meant to dominate weaker societies.

Explanation:

Reflecting an imperialist attitude of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Social Darwinism held that powerful nations were meant to dominate weaker societies and these actions were scientifically permissible. This philosophy became the justification of the exploitation of “others” around the world for the coming decades (or more)

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Match each economist to his economic belief.
    12·1 answer
  • Why did so many Northerners oppose the Dred Scott decision
    5·2 answers
  • What type of animals were raised on the haciendas
    7·1 answer
  • Which was not true of the armistice to end World War I?
    13·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes the trade relationship
    5·2 answers
  • What was the toy industry like in the 1950 and before?
    12·1 answer
  • What led to France's economic problems at the end of the reign of Louis XIV? Select all that apply. A)Socialism B) Dual monarchy
    8·1 answer
  • which of the following statements about interest groups can be added to the Pros column of the table - interest groups have used
    8·2 answers
  • After World War I, problems among nations had been resolved and relations were pretty good.
    8·1 answer
  • I'm so bored!!!, God take me with you.
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!