1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
stiks02 [169]
3 years ago
5

How would you describe the layout of streets and buildings in Dubai and London? What similarities and differences do you notice

in the images of the two cities
History
1 answer:
labwork [276]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The tall building is the most dominating symbol of the cities and a human-made marvel that defies gravity by reaching to the clouds. It embodies unrelenting human aspirations to build even higher. It conjures a number of valid questions in our minds. The foremost and fundamental question that is often asked: Why tall buildings? This review paper seeks to answer the question by laying out arguments against and for tall buildings. Then, it provides a brief account of the historic and recent developments of tall buildings including their status during the current economic recession. The paper argues that as cities continue to expand horizontally, to safeguard against their reaching an eventual breaking point, the tall building as a building type is a possible solution by way of conquering vertical space through agglomeration and densification. Case studies of some recently built tall buildings are discussed to illustrate the nature of tall building development in their respective cities. The paper attempts to dispel any discernment about tall buildings as mere pieces of art and architecture by emphasizing their truly speculative, technological, sustainable, and evolving nature. It concludes by projecting a vision of tall buildings and their integration into the cities of the 21st century.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Is the text below an example of 1st person point of view or 3rd person point of view? I feel awful. I think I'll lie down for a
frutty [35]

Answer:

1st person.

Explanation:

any use of "I", "I'm" ect

6 0
3 years ago
Compare and contrast the ways that seventeenth-century
Lina20 [59]

Answer:

<h2>Important differences - Unlike the other two, Charles I was not associated with any political Party, and had not "risen through the ranks" to become Leader. As a King, he achieved his position by heredity, and since no-one can choose their parents, this was used to justify the doctrine of "Divine Right" - God dedcides that a child shall be born into a Royal succession, and it is blasphemy to make any attempt to change this. Similarly, it was therefore the "will of God" that he should be succeeded by one of his children - the eldest son, in the English and Scottish tradition. In England, there was also the unusual situation that, as well as being Head of State, the King was also Head of a particular religious organization - the "Church of England" - which meant that he could not be expected to recognise any other form of Christianity. It was his enforcement of this which aroused resistance by such men as Cromwell, who was against any enofrced religon, and for "liberty of conscience". (This was why Cromwell subsequently also opposed Parliament when it attempted to enforce Presbyterianism,) There is perhaps case for seeing a similarity in Stalin, since "Marxist/Leninist Communism" was in fact a "religion", even though a godless one. There are virtually no comparisons with Hitler.</h2>

3 0
3 years ago
Who was the first prime minister of India ​
attashe74 [19]

Answer: First Prime Minister of India, Pandit Jawahar Lal Nehru was born in Allahabad Uttar Pradesh on 14 November 1889 and died on 27 May 1964 due to a heart attack.

8 0
3 years ago
Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment sought to keep former __________ from political office.
g100num [7]
Slaves thay dident whant to give them that power
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When and why did the south move from seeing slavery as a necessary evil to seeing it as a good thing?
const2013 [10]
People in the south considered subjection or slavery to be good thing in numerous viewpoints, for example, financial aspects, history, religion and social great. Individuals of the south profoundly concurred that the finish of bondage would severe affect the south and the economy. They trusted the cotton business would crumple, and Rice would not be beneficial. There was likewise a conviction that there would be an across the board of joblessness and disorder all through the south that would lead to bloodshed. As a history perspective they contended that slavery has been practiced all through history, and they asserted it was a characteristic event of humanity. Southern's even had a contention for star bondage religion shrewd. They noticed that Abraham (from the Bible) had slaves, and they asserted Jesus never took a stand in opposition to it.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • William Simmons capitalized on the rampant anti-Semitism, anti-Catholicism, and nativism of the 1920s to revive which group that
    12·2 answers
  • I need alissorina............
    12·2 answers
  • What was the final step president polks plan to defeat Mexico
    15·1 answer
  • Herodotus Gerda Hedwig Lerner Sima Qian Ibn Khaldun Simon Schama wrote the history of the Arabs and of the Berbers from North Af
    5·2 answers
  • What item do we use everyday made by the han chinese?
    13·1 answer
  • Match each term with its definition or description Christianity
    7·1 answer
  • Explain how the growth of cities affected agriculture in Mesopotamia society
    6·1 answer
  • The British plans for the Middle East after World War One?
    11·1 answer
  • A.
    7·1 answer
  • The ncaa took on its present day name in 1912. the birth of the ncaa, though, actually occurred in 1905 and the initial name of
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!