Answer:
Accept Project A and reject Project B
Explanation:
See the images to get the answer.
Decision: Required rate of return = 16% = Cost of capital.
If Internal rate of return (IRR) > the cost of capital = Accept the project.
If Internal rate of return (IRR) < the cost of capital = Reject the project.
From the basis of the formula, we can accept the project A because the IRR of Project A (19%) is higher than the cost of capital (16%). On the other hand, we can reject the project B because the IRR of Project B (14%) is smaller than the cost of capital (14%).
Answer : coefficient of determination.
In the regression analysis results on MS excel the SSR/ SS total is called as " coefficient of determination"
The answer is D.
Copy is usually used to indicate the letter have been send to someone else
Answer:
it has grown substantially
Explanation:
in the past, China's government has total control over other economy. They failed to run it efficiently since the system provide no incentives for people to work harder and invents new things.
In the 1980s, china started to adopted some aspect of Capitalism and let the private sector grow their influence in the economy.
As a result, many people start to have incentives to contribute more to the economy. This system basically allowed the citizens seek personal wealth for themselves, but they are indirectly improving the country's economy.
Answer:
Your opportunity cost of attending a game compared with the opportunity cost facing a college student 10 years ago is:
A) higher, because more games are televised today.
Opportunity costs are the cost of choosing one alternative from another.
In this case, when college students attend college football games they are unable to do other activities, not only while they are at the stadium or going to the stadium, but they are not able to purchase other goods. The cost of those alternatives that are lost are higher now because many college football games are televised now, before if you wanted to see a game you had to go to the game. So a student is now able to watch the game while doing other activities, or saving money for buying something else.
Can this change in opportunity cost account for the decline in college football attendance?
B) Yes, because these changes increase the opportunity cost of watching football games in person.
Even though opportunity costs do not involve actual cash payments, they are still important and individuals do consider them when they are choose one option over another. E.g. imagine if you had to choose between spending a considerable amount of money by attending a game (ticket, gas, beverages, etc.) or watching that game on TV and buying a few clothes instead or going on a date, etc. What option would you choose?
