Explanation:
He hadn't made any attempts to escape.
They had taken the boy to the doctor.
The cat had killed the mouse.
The dacoits had looted the shop.
They had accepted the invitation.
Answer:
Rhetoric
Explanation:
According to my research on methods or communication, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this is known as the term called Rhetoric. Like mentioned in the question this is known as a way of communicating that has a persuasive or impressive effect, but which is often regarded as lacking in sincerity or meaningful content.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
The narrator uses negative feelings when he looks at the House of Usher. He feels scared and that there is an anti-sublime qualities to the house. The tarn, the mist, the fissure running down the house, no traversal he had seen on his journey shows how away from reality this house is.
Explanation:
Indeed cities should be required to have detailed evacuation plans
> We cannot provide specific textual evidence because you forgot to attach the passage. However, we can comment on the following.
> Every city should have a very thought-out plan to evacuate the citizens in case of a natural disaster.
> In the absence of this plan, citizens are at the mercy of luck, and that is no good.
> Every local and state government should foster the culture of prevention instead of only reacting when the problem has arisen.
> Natural disasters did not warn you. They hit a city and if people are not prepared to act, what follows is panic and chaos.
We can conclude that every city should create the proper evacuation plan and have simulacrums or rehearsals so people could know how to act in order to prevent tragedies.
Learn more about this topic here:
brainly.com/question/10063889?referrer=searchResults
