Answer:
<u>Mistake of ignoring secondary effects</u>
Explanation:
Whenever there arises an adverse impact of a policy and it's implementation, owing to ignorance of secondary consequences, it is termed as ignoring secondary effects.
In short, it refers to assessing and viewing only the positive aspects of a policy or a move, meanwhile not taking into consideration the other adverse consequences which are also associated with the same policy.
In the given case, the environmentalists have only considered the generation of alternative sources of energy via windmills which will lead to preservation of fossil fuels. The proposed policy has been implemented without taking into account it's flip side i.e the harm it causes to bat population and migratory birds.
Thus, it can be stated that the environmentalists herein only considered the favorable outcome of a policy implementation and ignored the adverse effect of the same. Hence, they are said to have committed the mistake of ignoring the secondary effects.
Answer:
Price lining
Explanation:
Price lining is defines as the pricing strategy where related products are sold at different prices to customers.
Usually the price difference depends on the level of quality of the products.
For example a beverage company with different drinks having various flavours will have a different price for each one.
In the given scenario price lining is occurring at a larger scale when Marriott branded its entire family of accommodations based on different value propositions.
These include Ritz-Carlton and JW Marriott for the most discriminating patron, Marriott and Renaissance at the next level of full service, and an array of differentially positioned brands such Courtyard and Residence Inn.
Major benefits of business in the local economy include a boost in employment and discretionary income in the community, tax income increases for local governments and a loyal customer base for businesses.
The answer is ‘not necessarily. Jerry has the ability to buy a new car, but we don't know if he also has the willingness to buy a new car.’ Because willingness goes hand in hand with this scenario. Many people has the ability to buy things since they have the money for it but unfortunately, the lack the willingness to buy something can affect this scenario. If he lacks willingness, he won't able to buy the new car. The question here is, is he willing to buy the car?
Answer:
You need to deposit $58,481.53 today.
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Future value expected = $125,000
Period of investment = 7 years
Interest rate = 11% compounded quarterly
The amount of deposit needed today to earn $125,000 in 7 years at annual interest rate of 11% is calculated as follows:
N (# of periods) 28
I/Y (Interest per year) 11
PMT (Periodic Payment) 0
FV (Future Value) 125000
Results
PV = $58,481.53
Total Interest $66,518.47
