Answer:
a. Failure to pay penalty = 400
b. Failure to file penalty = $4,000
Explanation:
The monthly rate for failure to pay penalty is 0.5% while the failure to file penalty.
Since it is assumed that there are 30 days in a month, the 35 days after the due date of the return without obtaining an extension from the IRS is will be counted as 2 months regardless of the fact that the second month is just 5 files when she filed.
Therefore, we have:
a. Failure to pay penalty = $40,000 * 0.5% * 2 = 400
b. Failure to file penalty = ($40,000 * 5% * 2) = $4,000
c. Total penalties = (Failure to file penalty - failure to pay penalty for the same period) + Failure to pay penalty = ($4,000 - $400) + $400 = $4,000.
Therefore, the total penalty Isabella will pay is $4,000.
The question is incomplete. The complete question is as follows,
At December 31, 2011 the accounting records of Gordon, Inc. contain the following items:
Accounts Payable 2500
Land 30000
Building 31250
Notes Payable ?
Retained earnings 125000
Accounts Receivable 18750
Cash ?
Equipment 40000
Capital Stock 12500
If the Notes Payable is $10,000, the December 31, 2011 cash balance is:
Answer:
Cash = $30000
Explanation:
The accounting equation states that the sum of total assets is always equal to the sum of total liabilities plus total equity. We can state the equation as follows,
Total Assets = Total Liabilities + Total Equity
So,
(30000 + 31250 + 18750 + 40000 + Cash) = (2500 + 10000) + (125000 + 12500)
120000 + Cash = 12500 + 137500
Cash = 150000 - 120000
Cash = $30000
In this case, you would want to avoid a win-lose situation.
1. You would want a win-win (where both parties feel as though they are gaining something from the transaction).
2. You can never go into an international negotiation with the same mentality as you would for in the US. Every culture is different and you should be aware of those differences.
3. You should not move too quickly between subjects. You should always ensure all parties understand and agree, which may take time.
Answer: quid pro quo sexual harassment
Explanation:
The scenario represented in the question regarding Rhonda and her company's chief financial officer is referred to as quid pro quo sexual harassment.
Quid pro quo sexual harassment is a situation that occurs when benefits, pay, employment, position, training, title, position are based on the condition that the other individual involved agree to ones sexual advances. It should be noted that this is illegal.
