Answer:
the last one
Explanation:
he was a senator that ruled over the army and fought to expand Rome but in the end he took over and became one of the first true rulers of Rome
If you follow the steps proposed by the CRAAP test you can check whether the one responsible for the news/article(s) has any motivation to favor one side of the story, if the story is relevant, for instance, what is more relevant for the future of a nation? A governmental transaction or what a famous person has to say about Trump or Obama? Maybe highlighting the latter would be a strategy to hide or diminish the impact of the former piece of news, a smoke screen because itis easier to dwelve into what somebody says, gossip, than to check the truthfulness of some information about what is going on with some politicians.
Also, sometimes people get half of the story or are simply misled to believe a distortion of the true facts, that is why it is important to check if the information is verifiable and indeed if the information is true.
Austria-Hungary was an imperial power and it sough to have control over other countries. It already had control over Bosnia- which explains why Bosnians were angry, as they presumably wanted independence.
Serbians were afraid they might be annexed by Austria next, and on top of that, they had aspirations for Bosnia for themselves.
The significance is that there was more representation (our government is very similar) The idea is that everyone has a voice, and it was important for commonfolk AND rich men to be in governmental positions so that the population was represented more evenly (hope this made some sense! (: )
