Explanation:
Ethical doubts about genetic engineering motivate a view that many philosophers favour: that genetic therapy to eliminate disease and disability is ethically acceptable, given that the risks can be overcome.
But genetic enhancement is ethically problematic. The line between enhancement and therapy is difficult to draw.
Studies show people who are physically attractive are likely to earn more than those considered to have below-average looks. Does this mean “ugliness” is a disability that ought to be corrected by genetic engineering?
Or, similarly, is having a below-average IQ a disability, something that should be subject to change through gene-editing?
A person who smokes 1.5 packes daily gets 300 hits of nicotine to the brain each day. One cigarette has an average 10 nicotine in it. If one and a half pack has 30 sticks of cigarette. Nicotine is very very dangerous to a man's health. IT causes several types of caner. But the answer to your question is letter C - 300.
What is the difference between formal and informal language?
Formal and informal language serve different purposes. The tone, the choice of words and the way the words are put together vary between the two styles. Formal language is less personal than informal language. It is used when writing for professional or academic purposes like university assignments. Formal language does not use colloquialisms, contractions or first person pronouns such as ‘I’ or ‘We’.
Informal language is more casual and spontaneous.
The ansewer is d. I don't really wanna explain it but I need more letters to post answer :)
Answer:
Yes, I agree with this concept of behaviorists.
Explanation:
According to behaviorist view, true personal freedom does not exist. Personal freedom includes a lot of things like freedom of opinions, freedom of coming and going, freedom of religion, the freedom of right to privacy, the freedom of choosing careers, freedom of choosing the lifestyle, freedom of choosing the life partner and anything that involves a person's own choice of making decisions in his or her life.
I totally agree with the view of behaviorists. They say that true personal freedom does not exist. In many societies, people don't have rights to choose what they want. They can't make decisions for their personal stuff. They can't even choose what they actually want to study, they can't move in or out according to their will, they can't speak their heart out, they can't choose their religion, etc. So it is indeed true that personal freedom does not exist.
