"It was slow and difficult" best describes how the Supreme Court plan for desegregation was implemented.
Answer:
<h2>direct democracy</h2><h2>Issues and controversies</h2><h2>Discussions on direct-democratic institutions deal with several issues. The strongest normative grounds for direct democracy are the democratic principles of popular sovereignty, political equality, and all the arguments for participative democracy that support the idea that all citizens should have the right not only to elect representatives but also to vote on policy issues in referenda. Since assembly democracy cannot be an option in modern societies (outside Switzerland), direct-democratic institutions are regarded not as a full-scale alternative to representative democracy but as a supplement to or counterweight within democratic systems with major representative features. Nevertheless, the institutional difference and competition between representative and direct-democratic processes lie at the core of the controversy whether direct democracy contributes to undermining representative democracy or can offer enrichments of democracy.</h2>
<h3>Explanation:</h3>
<h3>correct me if I'm wrong</h3><h3>please brainless my answer</h3>
hat depends on the context, if your speaking about the colonization of when the pilgrams came then it started from the East Coast of what is today the United States and slowly worked its way West. In the beginning of the colonization 13 states were made on the East and the Native Americans had the entire west coast. Eventually more states were added as the colonials pushed further West, Their belief was in "Manifest Destiny" which was the belief that the Americans had the Right to move further west and colonize because it was Gods will. good luck hopefully this helps you
1.) Kept slaves illiterate and uneducated
2.)Used violence and beatings to make them submissive
3.) Using family members or things close to the slave in question
Radical republicans are a faction of republicans who mostly favored repressive measures and aggressive towards the southern states during the civil war. They were mostly contradicted by the moderate and conservative republicans.
Explanation:
They are the faction of politicians who undertook aggressive and harsh measures against the southern states during the civil war. they believed that the confederate leaders were responsible for instigating the civil war and intended the confederate leaders to be punished. they also need the emancipation of the slaves and to make republic party in power in both north and south.
Radical republicans were against the principles of emancipation declaration by Abraham Lincoln which was too lenient towards the south. This was in fact became the cause of the assassination of Lincoln. He was
