I think the correct answer is Spain, if it’s wrong, I’m sorry
The pre-charter Canada followed the Canadian Bill of rights which was rigid and ineffective, whereas the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in 1982 replaced the Canadian Bill of rights which was based on a broader human rights law.
<h3>What is the Canadian Charter of Rights?</h3>
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a far broader human rights regulation. It additionally has more strength as it applies to each federal and provincial legal guidelines and actions.
It is not like the Bill of Rights, the Charter is a part of the Constitution the very best regulation of the land.
hence, The pre-charter Canada followed the Canadian Bill of rights which was rigid and ineffective, whereas the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in 1982 replaced the Canadian Bill of rights which was based on a broader human rights law.
Learn more about Canadian Charter of Rights:
brainly.com/question/878830
#SPJ1
Answer: John Wilkes Booth
Explanation: John Wilkes Booth was an American actor who assassinated President Abraham Lincoln at Ford's Theatre in Washington, D.C., on April 14, 1865.
Answer:
Capitalism uses democracy and “free markets” to efficiently allocate capital to its most efficient use with little regard to economic equality. Communism focuses instead on massive state run “planned” economies allocating resources equally with little regard to personal ambition or incentive.
Explanation:
Capitalism uses democracy and “free markets” to efficiently allocate capital to its most efficient use with little regard to economic equality. Communism focuses instead on massive state run “planned” economies allocating resources equally with little regard to personal ambition or incentive.
<em>Plessy v. Ferguson</em> (1896) was a Supreme Court decision that upheld the principle of "separate but equal" in regard to racial segregation. The Court's decision said that separate, segregated public facilities were acceptable as long as the facilities offered were equal in quality.
In the decades after the Civil War, states in the South began to pass laws that sought to keep white and black society separate. In the 1880s, a number of state legislatures began to pass laws requiring railroads to provide separate cars for passengers who were black. At the heart of the case that became <em>Plessy v. Ferguson</em> was an 1890 law passed in Louisiana in 1890 that required railroads to provide "separate railway carriages for the white and colored races.”
In 1892, Homer Plessy, who was 1/8 black, bought a first class train railroad ticket, took a seat in the whites only section, and then informed the conductor that he was part black. He was removed from the train and jailed. He argued for his civil rights before Judge John Howard Ferguson and was found guilty. His case went all the way to the Supreme Court which at that time upheld the idea of "separate but equal" facilities.
Several decades later, the 1896 <em>Plessy v. Ferguson </em>decision was overturned. <em>Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka</em>, decided by the US Supreme Court in 1954, extended civil liberties to all Americans in regard to access to education. The "separate but equal" principle of <em>Plessy v. Ferguson</em> had been applied to education as it had been to transportation. In the case of <em>Brown v. Board of Education</em>, that standard was challenged and defeated. Segregation was shown to create inequality, and the Supreme Court unanimously ruled segregation to be unconstitutional.
