The facts stipulated in the experiment by Jecker and Landy support the notion of <u><em>the Ben Franklin effect</em></u>.
<h3>What is the
Ben Franklin effect?</h3>
This effect of psychology, published in the book <em>"You Are Not So Smart</em>" by David McRaney, indicates that a person tends to have a higher esteem of a person to whom he does a favor or to whom he helps, than of others that don't.
Therefore, when the examiner requests a monetary compensation given directly to him, as a favor, he obtained a higher esteem and evaluation of said persons.
If you want to learn more about Psychology, you can visit the following link: brainly.com/question/8063835
Answer:
It changes because they don't/can't feel how the celebrity feels when people spread hate.
Explanation:
Think of Donald Trump and how every time he tried to make the world a better place he ended up getting hate comments because of he views the world.
Answer: The Romans thought of themselves as highly religious, and attributed their success as a world power to their collective piety (pietas) in maintaining good relations with the gods. The Romans are known for the great number of deities they honored, a capacity that earned the mockery of early Christian polemicists.
Explanation:
Paul's thoughts are consistent with the view of behavior which emphasizes <u>"nurture".</u>
Nurture alludes to all the environmental variables that effect our identity, including our initial youth encounters, how we were raised, our social connections, and our encompassing society.
In social psychology, researchers may lead ponders taking a gander at how things, for example, peer weight and web based life impact practices, focusing on the significance of nurture.
Answer:
Multiple reimbursement scheme
Explanation:
What Donna Holbrook did is considered a case of multiple reimbursement. This means she requested the payment of the expense more than once. She first used the company credit card to buy the office supplies. This means that she didn’t use her own money because the credit card wasn’t hers. But a month after that, she used the receipt to request reimbursement from the company implying that she bought those supplies with her own money. By doing so, the company is paying twice for a purchase that was done only once. There’re also other kind of expense reimbursement schemes: <u>fictitious expense schemes</u> (when the expense is actually not real but made up by the employee); <u>overstated expense schemes</u> (when the employee inflates the expense in order to keep the extra money); and <u>mischaracterized expense schemes</u> (this occurs when the employee intends to get reimbursement for an expense that is personal and not related to the business).
