1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pishuonlain [190]
3 years ago
9

What is south america's highest mountain and where is it located?

Social Studies
1 answer:
d1i1m1o1n [39]3 years ago
6 0
The answer is Aconcagua, it is located in the province of Mendoza.
You might be interested in
What does the Preamble promise to do for the people of this country? How has it succeeded, and how has it failed?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution—the document’s famous first fifty-two words— introduces everything that is to follow in the Constitution’s seven articles and twenty-seven amendments. It proclaims who is adopting this Constitution: “We the People of the United States.” It describes why it is being adopted—the purposes behind the enactment of America’s charter of government. And it describes what is being adopted: “this Constitution”—a single authoritative written text to serve as fundamental law of the land. Written constitutionalism was a distinctively American innovation, and one that the framing generation considered the new nation’s greatest contribution to the science of government.

The word “preamble,” while accurate, does not quite capture the full importance of this provision. “Preamble” might be taken—we think wrongly—to imply that these words are merely an opening rhetorical flourish or frill without meaningful effect. To be sure, “preamble” usefully conveys the idea that this provision does not itself confer or delineate powers of government or rights of citizens. Those are set forth in the substantive articles and amendments that follow in the main body of the Constitution’s text. It was well understood at the time of enactment that preambles in legal documents were not themselves substantive provisions and thus should not be read to contradict, expand, or contract the document’s substantive terms.  

But that does not mean the Constitution’s Preamble lacks its own legal force. Quite the contrary, it is the provision of the document that declares the enactment of the provisions that follow. Indeed, the Preamble has sometimes been termed the “Enacting Clause” of the Constitution, in that it declares the fact of adoption of the Constitution (once sufficient states had ratified it): “We the People of the United States . . . do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Importantly, the Preamble declares who is enacting this Constitution—the people of “the United States.” The document is the collective enactment of all U.S. citizens. The Constitution is “owned” (so to speak) by the people, not by the government or any branch thereof. We the People are the stewards of the U.S. Constitution and remain ultimately responsible for its continued existence and its faithful interpretation.

It is sometimes observed that the language “We the People of the United States” was inserted at the Constitutional Convention by the “Committee of Style,” which chose those words—rather than “We the People of the States of . . .”, followed by a listing of the thirteen states, for a simple practical reason: it was unclear how many states would actually ratify the proposed new constitution. (Article VII declared that the Constitution would come into effect once nine of thirteen states had ratified it; and as it happened two states, North Carolina and Rhode Island, did not ratify until after George Washington had been inaugurated as the first President under the Constitution.) The Committee of Style thus could not safely choose to list all of the states in the Preamble. So they settled on the language of both “We the People of the United States.”

Nonetheless, the language was consciously chosen. Regardless of its origins in practical considerations or as a matter of “style,” the language actually chosen has important substantive consequences. “We the People of the United States” strongly supports the idea that the Constitution is one for a unified nation, rather than a treaty of separate sovereign states. (This, of course, had been the arrangement under the Articles of Confederation, the document the Constitution was designed to replace.) The idea of nationhood is then confirmed by the first reason recited in the Preamble for adopting the new Constitution—“to form a more perfect Union.” On the eve of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln invoked these words in support of the permanence of the Union under the Constitution and the unlawfulness of states attempting to secede from that union.

The other purposes for adopting the Constitution, recited by the Preamble— to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”—embody the aspirations that We the People have for our Constitution, and that were expected to flow from the substantive provisions that follow. The stated goal is to create a government that will meet the needs of the people.

Explanation:

Your welcome

6 0
2 years ago
What time do they announce college football playoffs
Usimov [2.4K]

Answer:

January 11th

Explanation:

This upcoming year the playoffs for collage football will start January 11th 2022

5 0
2 years ago
Why did Thomas Jefferson remove references to slavery from the Declaration?
zhannawk [14.2K]

Answer:

Those who drafted the Declaration believed that it was better to remove the section dealing with slavery than risk a long debate over the issue of slavery since they needed the support from the southern states that dealt with slavery.

4 0
3 years ago
Julie wants to go back to school. it will cost a lot of money and affect jeff, her husband. they sit down together and work out
tresset_1 [31]

This is an example of a Syncratic Decision


Syncratic decision making was developed by Herbst along with the other three decision making power structures (autonomic, husband dominant and wife dominant). Syncratic decision making means joint decision making by the husband and the wife.

4 0
3 years ago
What did alonzo herndon and john pemberton have in common during georgia new south era​
eduard
They were industrialists who started textile manufacturing plants. Hope this helped
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Canadian citizen Michael Hallat began visiting Trader Joe's grocery store in Bellingham, Washington several times a week. While
    7·1 answer
  • "all college students who drink beer make less than a 4.0 g.p.a. it is obvious then that drinking beer lowers a student's grades
    11·1 answer
  • "i understand your concerns, but i've had both the accountants and lawyers look at this and they don't see anything wrong here s
    13·1 answer
  • Read the following excerpt from John Calvin's Institutes of the Christian Religion. Then answer the following question:
    14·2 answers
  • A neessary ingredient for acid rain to occur is _______. A. air pollution B. heat pollution C. runoff pollution D. water polluti
    10·1 answer
  • What psychological school of thought was most concerned with the influence of the general principles of learning on an organism'
    12·1 answer
  • The diagram above is an example of a(n) __________. A. supply schedule B. pricing chart C. inventory scale D. projection scale
    12·1 answer
  • Help please ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
    9·1 answer
  • What’s was the main purpose of colonialism?
    12·1 answer
  • Are ravines and canyons the same or sort of alike? I just want to know.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!