Answer:
Option A.
Explanation:
The Soviets declined to allow polls in Eastern European countries, is the right answer.
Relations between the Soviet Union and the United States following the Second World War were induced by a complicated interaction of political, ideological and economic causes, which led to variations between cautious assistance and oftentimes bitter superpower competition over the ages. The distinct discrepancies in the political arrangements of the two nations often stopped them from arriving a mutual agreement on key management matters. However, tensions between the two nations increased when the Soviets declined to concede polls in Eastern European countries.
United States hope this helps!!!!
The record of European expansion contains pages as grim as any in history. The African slave trade—begun by the Africans and the Arabs and turned into a profitable seaborne enterprise by the Portuguese, Dutch, and English—is a series of horrors, from the rounding up of the slaves by local chieftains in Africa, through their transportation across the Atlantic, to their sale in the Indies.
American settlers virtually exterminated the native population east of the Mississippi. There were, of course,
exceptions to this bloody rule. In New England missionaries like John Eliot (1604-1690) did set up little bands of “praying Indians,” and in Pennsylvania relations between the Quakers and Native Americans were excellent. Yet the European diseases, which could not be controlled, together with alcohol, did more to exterminate the Native Americans than did fire and sword.
Seen in terms of economics, however, the expansion of Europe in early modern times was more complex than simple “exploitation” and “plundering.” There was, in dealing with the native populations, much giving of “gifts” of nominal value in exchange for land and goods of great value. The almost universally applied mercantilist policy kept money and manufacturing in the home country. It relegated the colonies to producing raw materials—a role that tended to keep colonies of settlement relatively primitive and economically dependent.
Answer:
What was the British East India Company's goal in India and what did they trade? They wanted to make money for the company's share holders. They traded cotton, silk, indigo, saltpeter (chemical used in gun powder), and tea. How were the British initially treated by the Mughal government in India?
Explanation:
The reason why the leaders of the countries with command and socialist economies would see the market economies as a threat to their leadership is because they will lose the power they have over the production, the land, the resources, the laborers.
In a market economy, pretty much everything is privately owned, and the government can only be regulating things in accordance to the law, but can not control the profit and the work of the companies. In a command or socialist economy, the leader of the country has total control over everything, thus controlling the whole profit of the country and how everything will be done, so by allowing a market economy, the leader will be directly affected with losing a lot of power from his hands.
