In the poem, the<em> two roads</em> are an example of what type of poetic device?
The following which is true about the 'speaker' in the poem, "The Road Not Taken" is:
- the speaker is taking a walk in the woods and approaches a fork in the road
The rhyme scheme and meter of this stanza is:
<h3>What is Poetic Device?</h3>
This refers to the different devices which are used by a poet to create his poem and some of them includes: assonance, rhyme, alliteration, etc.
Read more about poetic devices here:
brainly.com/question/24790113
Yes, age vs. youth is one of the conflicts in Daisy Miller, in terms of the contrast <span>between youth and elder characters in terms of personality, attitude and ideals in life. However, this is a minor conflict and can be expressed as conflict of traditions and customs instead. Obviously, Daisy Miller is a fun-loving, free-spirited young lady unlike most of the characters who are more serious and uptight. This difference between personality can be due to the fact that Daisy has a very youthful and adventurous persona. She doesn't let the opinion of other people to stop her from living her life, even if it taints her reputation. Daisy is also careless and a bit immature that can be associated with youth, although not at all times. Meanwhile, the older characters are the one disliking the carefree Daisy. This events in the story shows contrast of beliefs and principles of characters in which age influences though not at all times.</span>
C! The claim is what the article is about, and C is about the habitat is what the article is about.
Answer:
<h3>
Entreat</h3>
<em><u>to ask somebody to do something, often in an emotional way</u></em><em><u>.</u></em>
<h3>
Hearkens</h3>
<em><u>listen</u></em>
<h3>
lament</h3>
<em><u>a song, poem or other expression of sadness for somebody who has died or for something that has ended</u></em>
<h3>
Defray</h3>
<em><u>provide money to pay (a cost or expense).</u></em>
<h3>
Myraid</h3>
<em><u>a very large number of something</u></em><em><u>.</u></em>
<h3 /><h3 />
Answer:
The basis of this argument is that verbs are conjugated only in the present and past tense. If we want to refer to the future, we have to use the auxiliary verb will, or the be going to phrase followed by the verb in present or past, or the present tense. Since in English, there is no change in the conjugation of the verbs for the future, some linguistics claim that there are two tenses (past and present) while others claim that there are three because we form the future tense with the addition of the auxiliary or use present simple or continuous.
Explanation:
Linguistics such as Quicker Al claims that there are two tenses, present, and past since they are expressed by inflections in their verbs, while future does not have inflections. There is no future tense, but there is future time. Time is related to our perception of reality, making the future subjective. On the other side, tense expresses when an action happens, taking into account the moment that the person is speaking. Linguistics such as Hatav or Klein claims three tenses' existence, past, present, and future. They state that we can refer to the future with the addition of the auxiliary verb will, or the phrase be going to, or the use of present simple, or continuous even though there is no specific inflection in the verb, as it happens in other languages like Portuguese or Spanish. They identify the future with the definition of tense.
