Answer:
16+x
Step-by-step explanation:
He made a mistake in step #2. It seemed to be a trivial mistake because it involved signs, but it still had a great impact. Since step#2, his solution was already wrong.
Instead of
(-1)²-4(2)(-6) = 1 + 48 = 49
What he did is
(-1)²-4(2)(-6) = -1 + 48 = 47
Answer:
D)Yes, because the difference in the means in the actual experiment was more than two standard deviations from 0.
Step-by-step explanation:
We will test the hypothesis on the difference between means.
We have a sample 1 with mean M1=18.2 (drug group) and a sample 2 with mean M2=15.9 (no-drug group).
Then, the difference between means is:
If the standard deviation of the differences of the sample means of the two groups was 1.1 days, the t-statistic can be calculated as:
The critical value for a two tailed test with confidence of 95% (level of significance of 0.05) is t=z=1.96, assuming a large sample.
This is approximately 2 standards deviation (z=2).
The test statistict=2.09 is bigger than the critical value and lies in the rejection region, so the effect is significant. The null hypothesis would be rejected: the difference between means is significant.
Answer:
WORK For Exercises 44 and 45, use the information below and in the graph. Andrea works in a restaurant and is paid every two weeks. If Andrea earns $ 6.50 an hour, illustrate the Distributive Property by writing two expressions representing Andrea's pay last week.
Answer:
Patricia spent $24 on presents, while Donald spent $12 and Carl spent $36.
Step-by-step explanation:
The problem is to solve how much money each person spent on presents in the year, through a series of equivalences. In order to determine how much money each one spent, the following equation must be proposed:
Patricia = X
Donald = 1 / 2X
Carl = 3/2 X
X + 1 / 2X + 3 / 2X = 72
1X + 0.5 X + 1.5 X = 72
3X = 72
X = 72/3
X = 24
Thus, Patricia spent $ 24 on presents, while Donald spent $ 12 (2/24) and Carl spent $ 36 (1.5 x 24).
