Bea Moran wants to establish a long derivatives position in a commodity she will need to acquire in six months. Moran observes that the six-month forward price is 45.20 and the six-month futures price is 45.10. This difference most likely suggests that for this commodity: futures prices are negatively correlated with interest rates.
This is further explained below.
<h3>What are interest rates?</h3>
Generally, the fraction of a loan that is charged as interest to the borrower is often stated as a yearly percentage of the loan outstanding.
"lower interest rates encourage people to spend money on house upgrades"
In conclusion, Bea Moran would want to construct a long derivatives position in a commodity that she will need to buy in a little over half a year's time. Moran notes that the price of the six-month forward contract is now at 45.20, while the price of the six-month futures contract is currently at 45.10. Because of this disparity, it is quite probable that the prices of futures contracts for this commodity have an inverse relationship with interest rates.
Read more about interest rates
brainly.com/question/13324776
#SPJ1
If i understand your question properly, you want to determine how much each partner wiil have based on the sharing ratio.
Answer:
Alex- $40,000
Brad- $30,000
Carl- $30,000
Explanation:
For a net loss of $100,000 shared between partners in the ratio 4:3:3, the value of each partner's ratio can be calculated as seen below.
Step 1: Add the ratios
i.e; 4 + 3 + 3 = 10
Step 2: Calculate the value of each ratio in $100,000 using te formula
(ratio value ÷ total ratio) × $100,000
For Alex, we have
(4 ÷ 10) × $100,000
= 0.4 × $100,000
= $40,000
For Brad, we have
(3 ÷ 10) × $100,000
= 0.3 × $100,000
= $30,000
For Carl, we have
(3 ÷ 10) × $100,000
= 0.3 × $100,000
= $30,000
N.B: To confirm if the value of each ratio is correct, you can add up the values to see if it makes $100,000. If it doesn't, then the calculatio is wrong.
Adding the value of the ratios, we have $40,000 + $30,000 + $30,000 = $100,000.
i hope this helps
Hello! Sorry this is a little late.
I believe the correct answer to your question is $87.75.
I hope this helps, and have a great rest of your day!
Answer:
Call for someone then you need to help them as much as you can
Answer:
a. Show her the list and then take it away and have her testify from her 'refreshed recollection.'
Explanation:
In the given scenario Gloria testifies that when she came to work the day after the robbery, she noticed that large amounts of inventory were missing. She spent the entire day cataloguing the missing items.
In the trial she said she can remember what was stolen.
Under rule 612 the prosecutor is allowed to.show her the list and them take it away. Gloria can now testify from her refreshed memory.
On the other hand if she said she could recall the items the prosecutor would have under the hearsay exception (rule 803 (5)) requested she state the missing items.
But in this case she said she cannot recall the items
