Answer C is the right answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
h(x) = f(x) * g(x)
h(x) = (2*3^x ) * ( 3*3^2x )
2 * 3 is easy, that will be 6.
The ground number 3 remains 3 in h(x), so that is easy too...
But with multiplying exponents, you can add them.
Let's concentrate only on the exponents of f(x) and g(x)... and add them...
x + 2x =3x
So, now combine the easy part with this new exponent, and you get <u>h(x)</u><u> </u><u>=</u><u> </u><u>6</u><u>*</u><u>(3)^(3x)</u>
<u>So</u><u> </u><u>answer C is the right answer.</u>
Answer:
Both (B) and (C) are correct
Step-by-step explanation:
Explaining in simple terms, The Simpson's paradox simply describes a phenomenon which occurs when observable trends in a relationship, which are obvious during singular evaluation of the variables disappears when each of this relationships are combined. This is what played out when hitmire appears to d well on both of natyraknamd artificial turf when separately compared, but isn't the same when the turf data was combined. Also, performance may actually not be related to the turf as turf may Just be. a lurking variable causing a spurious association in performance.
Answer: No. If two lines have the same slope they are parallel lines (or they are the same line), so they cannot intersect at one point. Because the triangles are congruent, the angles where the lines meet the x-axis are congruent. Because the lines form the same angle with the x-axis, they are parallel.
Step-by-step explanation:
54•2=108
36•1=36
108+36=144
14•6=84
144-88=$56
Answer is $56.00
