Answer: Include a note that applauds their work
Explanation: When reviewing another student’s essay, it is important to remain respectful of their work. This reasoning is why three of the four options do not work.
While it would be wise to pay attention to the things other students do well, it can be considered plagiarism or copying to use the same technique in your own essay. This is why this option is invalid.
It is also unkind to focus only on what a student has done wrong. This negative criticism will help them realize their weak points, but will not make them aware of the strong points in the essay, something that you have realized. This is why this option is invalid.
By including a note that applauds their work, you are letting them know what they have done correct, while also boosting their confidence in their own writing skills. This is why it is the best option!
Keeping your observation to yourself so they don’t get prideful is wrong, as it does not help them understand the strong points in their essay. They will not know to use this skill in the future, making this an invalid option.
Hope this helps! Comment below for more questions.
The correct answer should be "analytical"
That is basically what analysis means, breaking something down into smaller chunks and examining each part thoroughly in relation to the whole.
"It would take days to get to the other side of this jungle of vines, hedges, shrubs, and weeds."
And
"Emma was determined to find the way through this maze of pathways tinnels and bridges."
Answer:
1. 2010
2. C, The U.S. lab module was added to ISS
3. B, 2017
4. B, 7
yea I kno that feeling I felt like I was alone when there was people all around me I felt like an outcast because they were interested in different things that I wasn't interested in so it mademe feel alone HOPE THIS HELPED
