let's firstly convert the mixed fraction to improper fraction and then take it from there, keeping in mind that the whole is "x".
![\stackrel{mixed}{5\frac{5}{6}}\implies \cfrac{5\cdot 6+5}{6}\implies \stackrel{improper}{\cfrac{35}{6}} \\\\[-0.35em] ~\dotfill\\\\ \cfrac{7}{3}x~~ = ~~5\frac{5}{6}\implies \cfrac{7}{3}x~~ = ~~\cfrac{35}{6}\implies 42x=105\implies x=\cfrac{105}{42} \\\\\\ x=\cfrac{21\cdot 5}{21\cdot 2}\implies x=\cfrac{21}{21}\cdot \cfrac{5}{2}\implies x=1\cdot \cfrac{5}{2}\implies x=2\frac{1}{2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cstackrel%7Bmixed%7D%7B5%5Cfrac%7B5%7D%7B6%7D%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B5%5Ccdot%206%2B5%7D%7B6%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Cstackrel%7Bimproper%7D%7B%5Ccfrac%7B35%7D%7B6%7D%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5B-0.35em%5D%20~%5Cdotfill%5C%5C%5C%5C%20%5Ccfrac%7B7%7D%7B3%7Dx~~%20%3D%20~~5%5Cfrac%7B5%7D%7B6%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B7%7D%7B3%7Dx~~%20%3D%20~~%5Ccfrac%7B35%7D%7B6%7D%5Cimplies%2042x%3D105%5Cimplies%20x%3D%5Ccfrac%7B105%7D%7B42%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%20x%3D%5Ccfrac%7B21%5Ccdot%205%7D%7B21%5Ccdot%202%7D%5Cimplies%20x%3D%5Ccfrac%7B21%7D%7B21%7D%5Ccdot%20%5Ccfrac%7B5%7D%7B2%7D%5Cimplies%20x%3D1%5Ccdot%20%5Ccfrac%7B5%7D%7B2%7D%5Cimplies%20x%3D2%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D)
i dont know, my personal thoughts is that I will not do it:)
Answer:
They both use the same units of measure.
Step-by-step explanation:
Well, first off, to solve for this, we can write the expression and then solve from there.
Expression: 8x + 3 = 29
So, now that we have our expression, we can solve for our missing number using the balancing method.
8x + 3 = 29
8x + 3 - 3 = 29 - 3 (we subtracted the three because we needed to get rid of the three on the left side of the equation do now we are just left with 8x = 26.
8x = 26
8x/8 = 26/8. (So, the 8 on the left side cancels out and we are just left with X.
X = 26/8
X = 13/4
X = 3 and 1/4
So, in conclusion, the answer to this question is: X = 3 and 1/4 as a mixed number or 13/4 as an improper fraction.
Glad I could help!
Answer:
c!!
Step-by-step explanation:
last saturday i did a worksheet that had the sae question
