The skepticism about the empire of Ghana and the accounts for it is nothing weird because the majority of what is written about it is from two people from the same place, that had totally different views and interpretations on the things, and came from different culture.
Very often in the historical text, the people that wrote something have been very subjective, not objective. Thus the writings of these two Arab geographers can be very misleading, as they described what they saw with their own eyes, but also with using their own perception. That has proven numerous times to give very inaccurate depictions of a society and culture, like the depictions of the Romans for the Celts, or of the Greeks for the Scythian female warriors that they named Amazons.
There's only one point of view unfortunately, and it is always much more reliable when multiple writings are available from people from multiple different backgrounds, or the best scenario if it is writings from the people in question.
I believe it was because both blacks and whites were moving west to the cities to find jobs.
hope i helped :)
Answer:
1. After Reconstruction, many southern states enacted a poll tax, which was used to Ensure poor African Americans could not afford to vote.
2.Literacy tests, requiring voters to pass in order to vote. Because African Americans were exploited economically and denied an education, these restrictions disqualified many of them as voters.
The third option is the correct answer.
That was the Gettysburg address because the Gettysburg battle was very violent and hit hard toll on the north
