Answer:
The tRNA would be unable to read the mRNA CODON, and will be unable to carry its corresponding amino acid
Explanation:
Protein synthesis occurs in two major stages; transcription and translation. Transcription involves the synthesis of a mRNA molecule while translation involves reading the sequence of the mRNA in order to synthesize amino acids that forms protein. Let's look at translation in details. Translation occurs with the help of a type of RNA molecule called transfer RNA (tRNA) present in the RIBOSOME (site of protein synthesis).
The tRNA possesses a group of three nucleotides called ANTICODON, which it uses to read the mRNA codon that is complementary to it i.e. an anticodon UAC will read mRNA codon AUG. The tRNA binds to the mRNA molecule in order to assess its nuceleotide sequence. Once, a complementary anticodon succesfully reads a particular mRNA codon, it carries the amino acid encoded by the mRNA codon it reads to the growing polypeptide chain. This is the normal translation process.
However, as stated in the question, that if a wrong anticidon successfully binds to a codon. This means that the anticodon that binds to the mRNA codon is not complementary to it. What would happen in this case is that the Anticodon will be unable to read that particular codon it binds to because the complementary base pairing rule is used to read i.e. A-U, G-C. Once, the anticodon cannot read the mRNA codon, the tRNA will also be unable to carry the amino acid that is encoded by that CODON.
Invertebrates
in- = not
vertebra = spine
I think the answer is most likely be J.
The first (F) one the population of the predator increases hugely while the population of the prey was neutral. And so both population didn’t seem to have any connection. Same goes for H. Graph G doesn’t make sense at all the population of the prey didn’t exist throughout the time in the graph but only exist in one single point of time and then just vanish again so that shouldn’t be the answer either.
In graph J, you can see the correlation between the two populations as the predator goes up and so does the prey.
You can search up on google predator-prey relationship graph to get better understanding.
<h3><u>Answer;</u></h3>
Evaluate the validity and reliability of processes and findings.
<h3><u>Explanation</u>;</h3>
- <em><u>Scientific argumentation is a stage of scientific inquiry in which scientists make claims, based on observable evidence, and then clarify with justification of the evidence as relevant to the claims.</u></em>
- <em><u>It is therefore, an important part of scientific inquiry as it aims evaluate the validity and reliability of processes and findings. Scientific claims from an investigation should be based on evidence that is justified based on the claims.</u></em>
