Answer:
concurring
Explanation:
a concurring opinion is in certain legal systems a written opinion by one or more judges of a court which agrees with the decision made by the majority of the court, but states different or additional reasons as the basis for their decision.
Answer:
Cherokee Nation v. Georgia.
Explanation:
The 1831 Supreme Court case of the Cherokee Nation v. Georgia was a court ruling between the Cherokee Nation, the petitioners, against the state of Georgia, the respondent.
In this court case, the Cherokees filed a complaint against the State of Georgia, asking if the state has any jurisdiction to impose laws on the Nation. This was because the state has promised Cherokee lands to Georgian settlers if they settle in the state. The court decided that since the Cherokees are a dependent nation, it cannot make any decision as it has no jurisdiction over the case. Thus, this means that the Cherokee Nation cannot have any legal recourse to stop the state from taking their lands. This case was then followed up by the 1832 Worcester v. Georgia ruling where the court ruled in favor of the Cherokee people.
Thus, the correct answer is Cherokee Nation v. Georgia.
Answer:
Important tools for building an ethical, inclusive organizational climate include core ideology, codes of ethics, preventing and eliminating destructive behaviors, fostering diversity, socializa- tion, and training.
Explanation:
credits :- wikipedia
Answer:
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLB)
Explanation:
The Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act (GLB) is a law that came into being to repeal existing laws so that banks, investment companies, and other financial services companies could merge. It was enacted in November 1999 by the 106th Congress of the United States.
This law is applicable to the entire insurance agents, brokers, and financial institutions and it highlights the rules around the privacy of information these agencies obtain from customers.
Answer:
<h3>
I couldn't really understand your question... but this is what I came up with</h3>
T.L.O. was a 14-year-old female student at a New Jersey high school. A teacher found T.L.O. and another student smoking cigarettes in the girls’ restroom in the school building in violation of school rules. The teacher brought the two students to a school administrator, who questioned each of them. The second student admitted to smoking cigarettes. T.L.O. denied the allegations. The administrator then accused T.LO. of lying to him, and demanded to see her purse in an attempt to find the cigar
