4/8/9 as an improper fraction.
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
The calculated value Z= 4.8389> 1.96 at 0.05 level of significance.
The null hypothesis is rejected.
There is significance difference between that the abrasive wear of material 1 not exceeds that of material 2 by more than 2 units
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Step:-(1)</u>
Given data the samples of material 1 gave an average (coded) wear of 85 units with a sample standard deviation of 4
Mean of the first sample x₁⁻ =85
standard deviation of the first sample S₁ = 4
Given data the samples of material 2 gave an average of 81 and a sample standard deviation of 5.
Mean of the first sample x₂⁻ =81
standard deviation of the first sample S₂ = 5
<u>Step :-2</u>
<u>Null hypothesis: H₀:</u> there is no significance difference between that the abrasive wear of material 1 exceeds that of material 2 by more than 2 units
<u>Alternative hypothesis :H₁: </u>there is significance difference between that the abrasive wear of material 1 exceeds that of material 2 by more than 2 units
Assume the populations to be approximately normal with equal variances.σ₁² =σ₂²
The test statistic
Given n₁=n₂=60.
On calculation, we get
Z =
z = 4.8389
The tabulated value Z =1.96 at 0.05 level of significance.
The calculated value Z= 4.8389> 1.96 at 0.05 level of significance.
The null hypothesis is rejected.
Conclusion:-
there is significance difference between that the abrasive wear of material 1 not exceeds that of material 2 by more than 2 units.
Finding the difference between the two temperatures, it is found that Regina is 38.7ºC degrees colder in January than in July.
----------------------------
- The mid-afternoon temperature in January is of -12.6ºC.
- In July, it is of 26.1ºC.
- The difference of the temperatures is given by:
From the difference of 38.7ºC, there are two interpretations:
- Regina is 38.7ºC degrees colder in January than in July.
- Regina is 38.7ºC degrees warmer in July than in January.
A similar problem is given at brainly.com/question/22136310