The attitude of Fernando is best explained by the cognitive dissonance theory which is the one responsible for the person to gain the consistency with their beliefs, opinions, etc. With Fernando's attitude of changing from capital punishment to opposing argument best describes the said theory.
Answer:
C, no because he was trespassing
Explanation:
The teenager was trespassing on somebody else's property and his action will not prevail in court. The general rule is : if somebody is trespassing on your property, you are not responsible for any injury occurring there.
<em>Dog owners must prove that the victim of the attack was illegally on the property to avoid liability.</em>
A 'Beware of the dog' sign does not remove liability from the dog's owner, it is only a warning.
The teenager was trespassing and the landowner is therefor not liable for his injuries.
He conqured other lands and assimulated greek cultures with theirs
Answer: The correct answer is : A. True
Explanation: Some signs of impaired judgment may include: behaving inappropriately, using rude language, telling jokes in bad taste, bothering others, becoming too friendly. All of the above may occur when the rate of alcohol consumption is increased.
Answer:
physical system don't determine human interaction, however, it does influence and constrain choices they make. hope that helps
