1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
musickatia [10]
3 years ago
5

What was the gulf of Tonkin resolution

History
2 answers:
vfiekz [6]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: The authorization for the use of US military force in Vietnam

Sidana [21]3 years ago
4 0
The  gulf of  Tonkin  resolution  was a joint resolution that  the  united states congress passed  on august 7 1964  in response  of the gulf  Tonkin  incident
You might be interested in
This is kind of little confuse question for me
natka813 [3]

Answer:

I think it's the second choice

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Re write in slope intercept form: 6x+5y=-15
ad-work [718]
Wrong category
......
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The 1830 Indian Removal Act is best understood as ________.
nevsk [136]

Answer:

The 1830 Indian Removal Act is best understood as an illustration of the widespread hatred of Indians during the Age of Jackson.

Explanation:

When Jackson rose to power the situation with the American Indians was extremely tense. Just a few years before, in 1815, the country began to expand towards the west and ran into the tribes of American Indians who had inhabited the country for centuries. Those occupied lands aroused the desires of the colonies, which initiated a series of campaigns to get the Natives to travel further west in exchange for all economic royalties.

In fact, already during Jefferson's tenure (in office between 1801 and 1809) it had been established that the only natives who could stay east of the Mississippi would be those who had "civilized" and could coexist with the "white man." Based on this, those that had remained in the region were the Chicksaw, Choctaw, Creek, Seminole and Cherokee tribes. These, in exchange for maintaining their territories, had fixed their settlements, tilled the land, divided their land into private property and had adopted democracy. Some became Christian (at least in appearance) so as not to be expelled from the area.

In 1830, just one year after taking power, Jackson decided to solve the Indian problem by the brave. That is, creating a law to deport them further west. That year, the Indian Removal Act was passed, which obliged the Indians to move to lands west of the Mississippi and authorized the president of the United States to act against all those located to the east of the Mississippi river.

Officially, the politician made this decision because of the need for land to produce cotton and for "national security" (to avoid conflicts between Indians and Americans). However, in addition to these two causes and his own racism, Jackson also sought to create a human barrier between the United States and the regions under the control of other transatlantic powers. With them, Jackson not only sought to empty the Indian territories colonized west of the Mississippi Indian conflicts, but also create a security belt to the Spanish and British threat that was still installed in large North American territories.

Regardless of the cause, in practice, tens of thousands of Indians were urged to leave the houses in which they lived (their lands for centuries) to leave for "reserved" territories.

At the official level, Jackson claimed that the natives had the possibility of refusing this "relocation" and keeping their home in the United States. However, the reality was that the government (at the head of which was the president) exerted a brutal pressure on the tribal chiefs to leave. In addition, they made it clear that, in the face of the refusal, they would use force.

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is an example of a legislative check on the executive branch, as
Ilia_Sergeevich [38]
<h3>Answer: D) Overriding a veto</h3>

=========================================================

Explanation:

When both houses of Congress agree on a law, they send the final bill to the President for it to be signed into law. If the President doesn't agree, then s/he has the option to veto the bill. After this point, the Congress has the option to override the veto if 2/3 of both houses agree to override.

This means that:

  • At least 67 Senators must agree to the override (note how 2/3 of 100 is 66.67 approximately, so 67 is the smallest number that clears this threshold)
  • At least 290 House of Representative members must agree to the override. This figure is due to (2/3)*435 = 290. There are currently 435 house members.

Both of those conditions listed above must be met for a veto override to occur. This is extremely difficult and rare considering the polarizing political climate. On things that nearly everyone agrees about, the President would likely not veto the bill (since the President is likely to agree with the Congress on such issues), and a veto override wouldn't even need to be considered.

6 0
2 years ago
Which best describes the role of the Communist government when it came to Russian economic matters?
Ierofanga [76]
Most likely c. i'm sorry if i'm wrong
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Help me fast please! will give brainliest
    13·1 answer
  • In which country did the u.s have 475,000 troops.in 1967?
    8·1 answer
  • Compared With Travel On Wagons, Travel On The Transcontinental Railroad Was ___?
    8·2 answers
  • After nearly 200 years of existence, the Persian Empire was conquered by which ruler, who controlled most of the western world i
    14·2 answers
  • BRAINLIEST ASAP! PLEASE HELP ME :)
    14·1 answer
  • Maps, graphs, and charts are _ of _
    7·2 answers
  • Conclusion for segregation, racism and slavery
    11·1 answer
  • Trevor was tried in a district court after being accused of committing a certain crime. At the end of the trial, the jury declar
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following, according to Confucius, is not a main relationship of humans?
    10·2 answers
  • How did Kaiser Wilhelms insistence on building up Germany's military make Germany less safe
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!