Answer:
operational definition
Explanation:
Operational Definition: This is a term used to describe the course of action of the research variables and the study. In this experiment, laugh can be defined operationally as a smile with a sound. Because of this operational definition, the psychologists can replicate the research or the experiment. The operational definition, when used to collect data, consists of a clear, and detailed definition of a measure.
The awnser should be cotton when it was back then
In Citizen Kane, Charles Foster Kane first met Susan Alexander when she was having a medical problem. It was a toothache.
When Susan and Kane first cross paths, Kane has been covered in mud from a passing car and Susan is suffering from a toothache. The social, age and socioeconomic gaps between the two that could have prevented their relationship in the past have been lessened by circumstances.
Despite Susan not knowing who he is, Kane likes that she enjoys his company. Kane explains to Susan that he was en route to a Manhattan storage facility to check over the belongings his mother left behind when she passed away before he ran into her.
One of the two movies that completely changed deep-focus cinematography was Citizen Kane. Even though we're in the middle of a close-up of the group speaking inside, you can see the youngster playing outside.
To learn more about Citizen Kane refer to:
brainly.com/question/4145312
#SPJ4
The rule of Augustus made Rome very powerful.
Explanation:
Augustus was a wise ruler who formulated law and order for Rome and its provinces very effectively.
He organised for a dedicated firefighter and police force inside the city to keep the Oder of the city paramount.
Then he introduced business laws across his rule which made the trade in the country bloom.
He also expanded the empire and started a system of integration into the Roman empire that brought more peace and prosperity even to the conquered lands.
Answer:
Democracy itself is defined through the concept of institution. A democracy, Przeworski told us, is possible when the relevant political forces can find institutions that give a reasonable guarantee that their interests will not be affected in an extremely adverse way in democratic competition, that is, when interests are subjected to institutionalized uncertainty. (1986). Trust in institutions is closely linked to political culture. Almond and Verba in The Civic Culture: political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations (1963) in a study carried out in 1959, they detect that in what they call a modern society there is much more participation, the key for them would be in the political culture. This refers to the attitude of individuals towards the political system and the role they play as individuals within it. Both attitudes, according to Almond and Verba, can be appreciated through certain patterns of orientation towards the political objects of a nation. These patterns can be of four forms: political orientation, which refers to the internalization of the objects of the political system and the relationships between these objects: the cognitive orientation of the system, which refers to the knowledge of what there is, for example the results of public policy; affective orientation, which focuses on feelings towards the political system, its roles, and functioning; and finally, evaluative orientation, which unites the elements of the previous orientations and allows generating evaluative criteria. Trust in institutions permeates these three levels of political orientation. Finally, Frederick C. Turner and John D. Martz (1997) have analyzed the case of Latin America, where the trust of citizens in institutions is an essential factor for the consolidation of democracy. Ludolfo Paramio (1999) argues that party identification and trust in institutions are conditions for the proper functioning of democracy. In short, institutions are the basis, feed and give value to democracy through various mechanisms at different times. March and Olsen (2006) point out that there are various theoretical approaches to institutions that are distinguished mainly by: first, how they conceive the nature of institutions; second, how they explain the processes that translate into structures and rules and their political impacts, and, lastly, the processes that turn human behavior into rules and structures to maintain, transform or eliminate institutions
