Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.
Answer: in trial the prosecutor uses witnesses and evidence to prove to the jury that the facts of the case and to determine if the defendant committed the crime the attorney will have an opportunity to cross examine or ask questions to the same witness.
Explanation:
C. is your answer ...........
Answer: everyone has a right to quality healthcare, rent control is a good thing, social safety nets are crucial, and every worker has a right to a living wage
