Answer:
This is known as typical amortisation
Explanation:
Amortization is defined as the process of spreading out a loan into a series of fixed payments over time. Brendan will be paying off the loan's interest and principal in different amounts each month. The payment is made up of parts that change over time. A portion of each payment goes towards:
The interest costs (what Brendan's lender gets paid for the loan).
Reducing Brendan's loan balance which also means paying off the loan principal. Especially with long-term loans, the majority of each periodic payment is an interest expense, and Brendan only pays off a small portion of the balance. In other words, he doesn't make much progress on the debt's principal repayment until closer to the end of the loan.
Answer:
African Americans experienced stereotype threat.
Explanation:
In a series of experiments performed by Steele and Aronson in 1995, they had subjects from both African-American and white descent to a partake in a verbal test.
The verbal test was divided into two groups, with one described as being a valid measure of intelligence while the second was defined as not reliable in terms of measuring intelligence.
With this bias in mind, the African-Americans performed poorly in the former condition because they experienced stereotype threat which was as a result of decades of being told they were not smart enough or as intelligent as whites.
Answer:
A. The words "good dog"
Explanation:
In this case, we know that the primary reinforcer is the treat. The dog is gaining an immediate reward for doing what you wanted it to do. But even after it, you also praise the dog. This praise is the secondary reinforcement. The secondary reinforcement will allow the trainer to deliver reinforcement even if the dog is not hungry, which might cause problems if you only use the primary reinforcement.
Good and bad pointsGood points of duty-based ethics<span><span>emphasises the value of every human being<span>Duty-based ethical systems tend to focus on giving equal respect to all human beings.This provides a basis for human rights - it forces due regard to be given to the interests of a single person even when those are at odds with the interests of a larger group.</span></span><span>says some acts are always wrong<span>Kantian duty-based ethics says that some things should never be done, no matter what good consequences they produce. This seems to reflect the way some human beings think.Rossian duty-based ethics modified this to allow various duties to be balanced, which, it could be argued, is an even better fit to the way we think.</span></span><span>provides 'certainty'<span>Consequentialist ethical theories bring a degree of uncertainty to ethical decision-making, in that no-one can be certain about what consequences will result from a particular action, because the future is unpredictable.Duty-based ethics don't suffer from this problem because they are concerned with the action itself - if an action is a right action, then a person should do it, if it's a wrong action they shouldn't do it - and providing there is a clear set of moral rules to follow then a person faced with a moral choice should be able to take decisions with reasonable certainty.Of course things aren't that clear cut. Sometimes consequentialist theories can provide a fair degree of certainty, if the consequences are easily predictable.Furthermore, rule-based consequentialism provides people with a set of rules that enable them to take moral decisions based on the sort of act they are contemplating.</span></span><span>deals with intentions and motives<span>Consequentialist theories don't pay direct attention to whether an act is carried out with good or bad intentions; most people think these are highly relevant to moral judgements.Duty-based ethics can include intention in at least 2 ways...If a person didn't intend to do a particular wrong act - it was an accident perhaps - then from a deontological point of view we might think that they hadn't done anything deserving of criticism. This seems to fit with ordinary thinking about ethical issues.Ethical rules can be framed narrowly so as to include intention.</span></span></span>Bad points of duty-based ethics<span><span>absolutistDuty-based ethics sets absolute rules. The only way of dealing with cases that don't seem to fit is to build a list of exceptions to the rule.</span><span>allows acts that make the world a less good place<span>Because duty-based ethics is not interested in the results it can lead to courses of action that produce a reduction in the overall happiness of the world.Most people would find this didn't fit with their overall idea of ethics:</span></span></span>
...it is hard to believe that it could ever
Answer : true
Explanation:
The facts has been established that every event has a cause, and without the cause, there will be no event.
Without any sign or clue of a potential event, it is not possible to identify the root cause, there is always an cause an effect but to understand the event ,we need to know the cause of such event.
So the above statement is true.